Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 17;4:201. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-201

Table 1.

Assessment of methodological quality of the included RCTs by Jadad scoring criteria*

Trial Randomized† Double-blinded§ A description of withdrawals or dropouts Jadad score
Inyang-Etoh PC, 2009 1 2 0 3
Borrmann S, 2001 2 2 1 5
Santos AT, 1979 1 2 1 4
McMahon JE, 1979 1 1 1 3
Katz N, 1979 1 2 1 4
Liu ZG, 1997 1 0 1 2
Song Y, 2006 1 2 0 3
Li YS, 2005 1 2 1 4
N'Goran EK, 2003 2 2 1 5
Utzinger J, 2000 2 2 1 5
Tian ZY, 1999 2 2 0 4
Huang AS, 1999 1 2 1 4
Song Y, 1998 1 2 1 4
Xu MS, 1997 1 2 1 4
Tian ZY, 1997 1 2 1 4
Wang JL, 1997 1 2 1 4
Xiao SH, 1996 1 2 0 3
Xiao SH, 1995 1 2 1 4
Xu MS, 2001 1 2 0 3
Cui JF, 2001 1 2 0 3
Sun MX, 2000 1 2 0 3
Zhang SJ, 2000 1 2 0 3
Yi ZH, 2000 1 2 1 4
Liu HY, 1999 1 2 0 3
Xu MS, 1998 2 2 0 4
Liu ZD, 1996 1 2 0 3
Xu MS, 1996 1 2 1 4
Wu LJ, 1995 1 2 1 4
Hou XY, 2008 1 2 1 4

* Range 0~5 (the higher the Jadad score is, the higher the quality of study is).

† Represents generation of allocation sequence.

§ Represents allocation concealment.