Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2011 Oct 5;187(10):5246–5254. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101113

Table II.

Comparison of platypus Cμ with opossum Cμ and conventional mammalian TCR C regions

Platypus Cμ N=6 Platypus Cδ N=1 Opossum Cμ N=8 4 N=5 5 N=5 6 N=5 7 N=4
Platypus Cμ N=61 80-982(843) 43-47(44) 50-56(52) 41-54(50) 21-26(24) 25-32(29) 27-33(31)
Platypus Cδ N=1 43-47(44) 100 43-47(45) 46-53(50) 26-30(28) 29-32(30) 29-33(32)
Opossum Cμ N=8 50-56(52) 43-47(45) 75-96(83) 41-54(48) 21-30(25) 26-34(30) 26-33(29)
Cδ N=5 41-54(50) 46-53(50) 41-54(48) 55-83(67) 21-30(25) 24-31(27) 28-34(31)
Cα N=5 21-26(24) 26-30(28) 21-30(25) 21-30(25) 45-87(54) 22-33(27) 24-33(27)
Cβ N=5 25-32(29) 29-32(30) 26-34(30) 24-31(27) 22-33(27) 63-93(72) 28-36(31)
Cγ N=4 27-33(31) 29-33(32) 26-33(29) 28-34(31) 24-33(27) 28-36(31) 48-76(54)
1

Number of sequences included in the comparison

2

The range of % nucleotide identity

3

The mean % nucleotide identity

4

Cδ sequences of human, mouse, opossum, bandicoot, wallaby

5

Cα sequences of human, mouse, opossum, echidna, platypus

6

Cβ sequences of human, mouse, opossum, echidna, platypus

7

Cγ sequences of human, mouse, opossum, platypus