Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Jun;11(2):131–143. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0027-0

Table 1.

Distribution of participants’ highest and lowest BIC scores among models with and without eligibility traces, and means and standard errors of the BIC scores by model

Traces Algorithm Number of Participants
BIC Scores
Highest Lowest M SE
Without AC 12 1 1,416 83
Q 1 5 1,342 88
SARSA 0 7 1,343 87
With AC 12 1 1,380 97
Q 1 5 1,337 97
SARSA 0 7 1,338 97