Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 3;11:e40.

Table 3.

Characteristics of each study included

Source No. of breasts Mean age, y Mean body mass index Infections, n (%) Seromas, n (%) Hematomas, n (%) Explantation, n (%)
Antony et al ADM 153 44.5* 23.8 5 (3.3) 11 (7.2) 3 (2.0) 9 (5.8)
Control 2910 48.1* 26.3 38 (1.3) 47 (1.6) 26 (0.9) 55 (1.9)
Chun et al ADM 269 47 25.5 24 (8.9) 38 (14.1) 6 (2.2) 16 (5.9)
Control 146 46.2 23.8 3 (2.1) 4 (2.7) 2 (1.4) 1 (0.7)
Lanier et al ADM 52 51 29.8 15 (28.9) 8 (15.4) 0 (0) 10 (19.2)
Control 75 50 24.7 9 (12) 5 (6.7) 0 (0) 4 (5.3)
Liu et al ADM 266 NA 24.9 18 (6.7) 19 (7.1) 1 (0.4) 13 (4.8)
Control 204 NA 24.8 5 (2.4) 8 (3.9) 0 (0) 5 (204)
Nahabedian ADM 100 46 NA 5 (5) NA NA 2 (2.0)
Control 376 NA NA 22 (5.85) NA NA 20 (5.3)
Preminger et al ADM 45 NA NA 3 (6.7) 3 (6.7) 1 (2.2) NA
Control 45 NA NA 1 (2.2) 2 (4.4) 0 (0) NA
Sbitany et al ADM 92 48.6 26.4 4 (8) 3 (6) NA 4 (4.3)
Control 84 51.7 28.2 3 (6) 3 (6) NA 3 (3.6)

ADM indicates acellular dermal matrix; BMI, body mass index; NA, not available.

*Median.