Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Pain. 2011 Jul 23;15(10):1087.e1–1087.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.06.012

Table 2.

Factors Associated With Probability of Having a Pain Discussion and Length of the Discussion

Probability of
Having a Pain
Discussion
Length of
Discussion on Pain

OR Hazard
Ratio
%
Diff
Topic order (2nd or 3rd) NA 1.68 * −32
Topic order (4th, 5th, or 6th) NA 2.22 ** −44
Topic order (≥7th) NA 4.62 ** −68
Patient had more than high school education 0.91 0.73 * 25
SF36 bodily pain 0.97 * 1.01
Pysician practiced family medicine 0.75 1.14
Pysician’s years in practice 1.00 1.00
Pysician’s supportiveness 1.03 * 1.00
Years of patient-pysician relationship 0.98 1.03 ** −2
Number of instances per topic NA 0.73 ** 26
Patient initiation of pain topic NA 1.05
Presence of patient’s companion 1.10 0.91
Patient and pysician from different race
 (control: same race)
1.08 1.46 * −24
Patient and pysician of different gender
 (control: same gender)
1.61 * 0.91
Patient and pysician of dissimilar age
 (control: ≤10 years of age difference)
1.51 0.83

Shape parameter NA 1.35
N 364 227

Note:

*

P<0.05

**

p<0.01

NA: topic-level variables, not included for visit-level analysis