Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2011 May 25;130(5):1151–1159. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26098

Table 3.

LINE-1 levels in relation to risk of bladder cancer, The Shanghai Bladder Cancer Case-Control Study

LINE1 in tertiles among total subjects
Ptrend
1st (82.52+) 2nd (81.22-<82.52) 3rd (<81.22)
Total Subjects
 No. cases/no. controls 154/177 165/176 191/175
 OR (95% CI) * 1.00 (reference) 1.10 (0.81–1.50) 1.28 (0.95–1.73) 0.268
By gender
 Men
  No. cases/no. controls 132/143 134/143 134/119
  OR (95% CI) * 1.00 (reference) 1.03 (0.73–1.42) 1.23 (0.87–1.73) 0.455
 Women
  No. cases/no. controls 22/34 31/33 57/56
  OR (95% CI) * 1.00 (reference) 1.57 (0.74–3.31) 1.58 (0.82–3.04) 0.360
By smoking status at reference date
 Nonsmokers
  No. cases/no. controls 40/75 50/74 88/87
  OR (95% CI) * 1.00 (reference) 1.34 (0.79–2.28) 1.91 (1.17–3.13) 0.032
 Former smokers
  No. cases/no. controls 25/33 32/31 22/25
  OR (95% CI) * 1.00 (reference) 1.37 (0.66–2.83) 1.10 (0.50–2.43) 0.682
 Current smokers
  No. cases/no. controls 89/69 83/71 81/63
  OR (95% CI) * 1.00 (reference) 0.93 (0.59–1.45) 0.99 (0.63–1.56) 0.938
*

All odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age at reference date (continuous) and family history of cancer (yes/no); regression models for total subjects and by smoking status were also adjusted for gender (male/female); regression models for nonsmoking subjects at reference date were also adjusted for ETS exposure status (yes/no).