Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 1;1(2):e000352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000352

Table 3.

Internal consistency at baseline

Scales (item exemplification) Cronbach's α Number of items Item-total correlation rit Item difficulty Pi in %
Communication (“If I talk to somebody, I will not interrupt him/her”) α=0.73 9 0.35–0.48 57–86
Response category: 4-point scale (I do not agree–I agree)
Self-esteem (“I sometimes think that I'm no good”) α=0.70 5 0.25–0.60 60–85
Response category: 4-point scale (I do not agree–I agree)
Self-efficacy (“Whatever happens, I will handle it”) α=0.61 5 0.26–0.41 58–70
Response category: 4-point scale (I do not agree–I agree)
Self-concept (“I'm aware of my strengths”) α=0.67 8 0.27–0.42 55–82
Response category: 4-point scale (I do not agree–I agree)
Class climate (“We help each other”) α=0.73 9 0.35–0.48 57–86
Response category: 4-point scale (I do not agree–I agree)
Bullying (“How often have you taken part in bullying (kicked, beaten) another student?”) α=0.71 3 0.51–0.57 5–13
Response category: 5-point scale (Never–Few times a week)
Victimisation (“How often have you been bullied (kicking, beating) by another student?”) α=0.78 3 0.57–0.67 14–22
Response category: 5-point scale (Never–Few times a week)
Smoking-related perceived risks (“I will be sick”) α=0.76 6 0.43–0.58 60–78
Response category: 4-point scale (Surely not–Surely yes)
Alcohol-related perceived risks (“I will be sick”) α=0.79 5 0.53–0.61 63–80
Response category: 4-point scale (Surely not–Surely yes)