Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov;128(5):926–936. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0520

TABLE 3.

Quit Rates and Adjusted Odds Ratios in Intervention Compared With Control Schools Among All Students and According to Gender

3 mo
12 mo
Unadjusted % Quit Model 1, Adjusted OR (95% CI)a Model 2, Adjusted OR (95% CI)b Pb Unadjusted % Quit Model 1, Adjusted OR (95% CI)a Model 2, Adjusted OR (95% CI)b Pb
Self-reported quitting among all students 2.01 (1.16–3.49) 1.90 (1.12–3.24) .017 1.09 (0.80–1.50) 1.00 (0.69–1.44) .99
    Control 5.9 14.3
    Intervention 10.7 15.3
Self-reported quitting among girls 0.99 (0.47–2.11) 0.94 (0.44–2.01) .9 1.10 (0.69–1.77) 1.08 (0.64–1.80) .8
    Control 7.0 15.5
    Intervention 6.6 16.6
Self-reported quitting among boys 3.52 (1.76–7.04) 3.23 (1.63–6.43) .001 1.06 (0.65–1.72) 0.92 (0.54–1.57) .8
    Control 4.9 13.2
    Intervention 15.0 13.9
Male vs female relative difference 3.54 (1.37–9.16) 3.43 (1.30–9.06) .01 0.96 (0.47–1.96) 0.85 (0.41–1.80) .7
Cotinine-validated quitting among all students 2.63 (1.36–5.10) 2.56 (1.35–4.86) .004 1.39 (0.69–2.77) 1.20 (0.56–2.58) .6
    Control 3.2 3.9
    Intervention 7.8 5.3
Cotinine-validated quitting among girls 1.30 (0.55–3.07) 1.35 (0.56–3.25) .5 1.41 (0.60–3.29) 1.38 (0.57–3.37) .5
    Control 4.3 5.3
    Intervention 5.5 7.4
Cotinine-validated quitting among boys 5.01 (2.01–12.47) 4.65 (1.88–11.53) .001 1.15 (0.35–3.78) 0.89 (0.26–3.05) .9
    Control 2.3 2.7
    Intervention 10.4 3.1
Male vs female relative difference 3.85 (1.16–12.85) 3.44 (1.00–11.75) .049 0.81 (0.20–3.28) 0.65 (0.16–2.68) .5
Cotinine-imputed quitting among all students 2.52 (1.32–4.84) 2.30 (1.22–4.33) .01 1.61 (0.95–2.73) 1.44 (0.79–2.62) .2
    Control 4.1 6.8
    Intervention 9.2 10.7
Cotinine-imputed quitting among girls 1.40 (0.61–3.21) 1.33 (0.57–3.06) .5 1.63 (0.87–3.04) 1.60 (0.81–3.14) .2
    Control 5.1 9.5
    Intervention 6.6 14.8
Cotinine-imputed quitting among boys 4.24 (1.83–9.85) 3.71 (1.62–8.51) .002 1.36 (0.57–3.29) 1.14 (0.45–2.87) .8
    Control 3.3 4.6
    Intervention 12.0 6.2
Male vs female relative difference 3.03 (1.03–8.91) 2.80 (0.95–8.28) .06 0.84 (0.31–3.28) 0.71 (0.26–1.98) .5
a

Overall model was adjusted for school. The model according to gender is adjusted for school, gender, and the interaction of gender and the intervention.

b

Overall model was adjusted for baseline self-efficacy, stage of change, smoking every day, and school, and the model according to gender was adjusted for baseline self-efficacy, stage of change, and smoking every day, school, gender, and the interaction of gender and the intervention.

Population-averaged logistic regression models were used for all analyses.