Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov;77(22):8015–8024. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05933-11

Table 5.

LRI, HRI, and TRI values for DGGE fingerprint profiles of total fecal DNA

Fecal sample No. of samples LRI
HRI
TRI
Mean ± SEa Minimum–maximum P value Mean ± SEb Minimum–maximum P value Mean ± SEc P value
Cross-sectional
    Patients with CF 20 13.0 ± 1.1 3.0–23.0 0.63 5.9 ± 0.6 0.0–11.0 0.42 19.2 ± 1.4 0.65
    Siblings 22 13.8 ± 1.2 5.0–27.0 5.3 ± 0.5 5.0–27.0 20.6 ± 1.5
Longitudinal patient sibling pair 1
    Patient 1 7 8.3 ± 1.0 6.0–14.0 0.02d 5.4 ± 1.6 1.0–14.0 0.08d 13.9 ± 1.9 0.28
    Sibling 1 8 15.5 ± 2.8 6.0–26.0 2.4 ± 0.4 1.0–4.0 18.1 ± 3.1
Longitudinal patient sibling pair 2
    Patient 2 8 7.0 ± 1.1 4.0–12.0 0.22 3.5 ± 0.8 1.0–8.0 0.08 11.0 ± 1.5 0.16
    Sibling 2 8 10.0 ± 2.1 4.0–20.0 5.4 ± 0.6 4.0–9.0 15.6 ± 2.7
a

Mean number of bands in the low-%GC region of the DGGE fingerprint profile.

b

Mean number of bands in the high-%GC region of the DGGE fingerprint profile.

c

Mean total number of bands in the DGGE fingerprint profile.

d

Significant difference between CF samples and sibling samples (95% CI).