Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov;49(11):3812–3819. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00847-11

Table 3.

Diversity and richness data for wound samplesa

Patient no. Wound healedb OTU 3% OTU 5% Shannon 3% Shannon 5% ACE 3% ACE 5% Cleaned 3% Assemble 3% Clusters 3%
1 No 136 55 4.15 3.22 163 59 10.18 12 14
2 No 469 181 5.47 4.45 565 204 11.2 12 10
3 No 652 321 5.84 5.00 816 384 14 13 14
4 No 326 148 4.60 3.66 397 180 11 10 13
8 No 814 391 5.98 5.04 1077 478 12.9 13 13
5 Yes 65 34 3.36 2.80 72 37 8.3 6 7
6 Yes 89 36 3.78 2.97 117 37 8.6 10 8
7 Yes 38 20 2.88 2.31 63 26 6.2 5 6
9 Yes 202 80 4.74 3.89 242 87 8.2 8 7
10 Yes 201 92 4.35 3.56 229 105 8.2 7 7
a

OTU, operational taxonomic unit; ACE, abundance-based coverage estimator; Shannon, Shannon diversity index; 3%, index derived from sequences with <3% divergence (>97% alignment with database sequence); 5%, index derived from sequences with <5% divergence (>95% alignment with database sequence).

b

Six months after baseline sample.