Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov;85(22):11725–11731. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05680-11

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Bonding between 2F5 HCDR2 DH54 and gp41 MPER 665K (27). The contact surface of 2F5 bound to its antigenic peptide shows a strong complementarity of charge, and two CDR H2 residues, DH56 and DH54, interact through hydrogen bonds and salt bridges with K665 of the 2F5 core tripeptide DKW. Based on the CDR H2 substitutions in the two UAs, the following predictions can be made. First, the CDR H2 DH54 residue in variant 1 is retained and, if positioned appropriately, could form a salt bridge with K665 of the 2F5 core DKW. However, the bulky side chain of WH53 (from SH53 to WH53, red arrow) is very likely to perturb the local environment of HCDR2, through potential steric clashes with HCDR1 backbone and FH32 side chain, and disruption of the H bond with GH33. Second, the additional alteration of DH54 to NH54 in UA variant 2 HCDR2 will disrupt the salt bridge with 665K. Also, there is a potential for HCDR2 NH54 to H bond with DH56, which would further preclude establishing bonding with gp41 K665. Critical CDR residues are labeled in green, HCDR1 residues are labeled in blue, and gp41 MPER residues are labeled in black. gp41 MPER is shown in yellow, and 2F5 antibody backbone is shown in white.