Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 20;11:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-140

Table 2.

QTLs for shoot regeneration traits (Bud percentage (B), Regeneration percentage (R) and Productivity Rate (PR)) found to be significant at the empirical genome wide mapping threshold by restricted Multiple QTL Mapping (rMQM) in BC1 and Interval Mapping (IM) in F2

Test QTL analysis Trait QTL Genome wide significant threshold level (P < 0.05) Chr Start
(cM)
Finish
(cM)
Coverage (cM) LOD Peak Position of LOD peak (cM) Peak marker a %variance explained Estimated additive effect Estimated dominance effect
BC1 rMQM B SpRg-1 2.7 1 3.87 44.42 40.55 7.12 22.47 C2_At1g65520/C2_At2g45910 23.9 -31.56
BC1 rMQM R SpRg-1 2.7 1 3.87 43.42 39.55 5.52 24.47 C2_At1g65520/C2_At2g45910 15.0 -24.10
BC1 rMQM PR SpRg-1 2.8 1 3.87 34.42 30.55 4.19 22.47 C2_At1g65520/C2_At2g45910 10.2 -0.70

BC1 rMQM B Rg-3 2.7 3 42.41 55.80 13.39 4.64 50.47 ME20-199 12.2 -21.60
BC1 rMQM PR Rg-3 2.8 3 32.77 63.10 30.33 4.26 50.47 ME20-199 10.6 -0.68

BC1 rMQM R SpRg-4a 2.7 4 44.39 61.24 16.85 4.94 50.24 TAHINA-4-71, 3 13.3 -22.29

BC1 rMQM PR SpRg-4b 2.8 4 81.33 93.18 11.85 3.08 86.33 SSR214/SSR146 7.4 -0.63
F2 IM B SpRg-7 3.7 7 2.20 40.28 38.08 6.84 19.51 ME10-141/C2_At4g26680 27.0 -22.20 12.32
F2 IM R SpRg-7 3.6 7 4.50 40.28 35.78 6.18 19.51 ME10-141/C2_At4g26680 24.8 -23.29 13.63
F2 IM PR SpRg-7 4.4 7 19.51 36.28 16.77 5.72 28.28 C2_At1g17200 23.1 -1.53 -0.55
BC1 rMQM R SpRg-7 2.7 7 0.00 25.08 25.08 5.47 13.44 TAHINA-7-43 14.9 -23.13
BC1 rMQM PR SpRg-7 2.8 7 3.54 28.23 24.69 5.28 13.44 TAHINA-7-43 13.5 -0.77

BC1 rMQM B SpRg-8 2.7 8 41.18 53.37 12.19 3.84 46.37 C2_At1g64150 12.2 21.25
BC1 rMQM R SpRg-8 2.7 8 42.18 58.90 16.72 4.25 53.37 C2_At1g64150/C2_At4g23840 9.3 19.35

aIn case of the absence of a peak marker, loci flanking the likely peak of a QTL are shown.