Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;27(3):888–897. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.12.003

Table 3.

Socio-economic factors related to urbanicity (continuous and ranked data).

Factor Mean with 95%CI
Test statistics p-value
Urban Peri-urban Rural
Number of households/km2 (log) 3.0 ± 1.0 2.2 ± 0.7 1.8 ± 0.6 UP: F1,57 = 21.37 p < 0.001
Back-transformed: number/km2 1047 (96–11, 481) 174 (39–776) 62 (16–240) PR: F1,25 = 13.56 p = 0.001



Distance from city centroid (m, sqrt) 80.0 ± 11.3 110.2 ± 7.9 130.5 ± 9.7 UP: F1,68 = 25.34 p < 0.001
Back-transformed: km 6.4 (4.7–8.3) 12.1 (10.5–13.9) 17.0 (14.6–19.7) PR: F1,26 = 19.55 p < 0.001



Transportation cost to Kampala (log) 6.3 ± 0.2 6.7 ± 0.2 7.2 ± 0.3 UP: F1,56 = 13.29 p < 0.001
Back-transformed: Uganda Shillings 545 (446–665) 812 (665–992) 1339 (992–1808) PR: F1,24 = 15.93 p < 0.001



Time to nearest trading centre (log) 2.2 ± 1.2 1.8 ± 1.2 3.4 ± 1.3 UP: p = 0.488
Back-transformed: min 9.2 (2.8–30.2) 6.1 (1.8–20.7) 28.7 (8.2–100.6) PR: p = 0.010



Perception of pollution (rank: 0–2)a 1.0 1.0 0.0 H2 = 15.56 p < 0.001
Land price (0.2nd power) 61.3 ± 5.6 49.1 ± 5.5 44.2 ± 7.3 UP: F1,51 = 19.66 p < 0.001
Back-transformed: million Shil/acre 866 (536–1340) 285 (158–485) 169 (68–362) PR: F1,22 = 2.11 p = 0.16

UP: between urban and peri-urban, PR: between peri-urban and rural, sqrt: square root.

a

Values for perception of pollution are median.