Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2011 Oct 12;19(10):1456–1466. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.08.002

Table 2.

Translation activities of IRES mutants

Mutant Translation Activity a Mutant Translation Activity a
WT 100 ± 7 %b WT 100 ± 7 %b
SII penult 5′x 19 ± 4 % A136G 134 ± 16 %
SII penult 3′x 74 ± 11 % A136C 134 ± 6 %
SII penult comp 61 ± 5 % A136U 99 ± 10 %
SII ult 5′x 103 ± 4 % A288U 20 ± 3 %
SII ult 3′x 75 ± 7 % U297A 104 ± 8 %
SII ult comp 70 ± 8 % A288U,U297A 32 ± 9 %
SII end comp 50 ± 1 %c A288C 98 ± 10 %
SI end GU 98 ± 12 % U297G 24 ± 3 %
SI end AU 93 ± 7 % A288C,U297G 50 ± 4 %
SI penult 5′x 38 ± 4 % A288G 107 ± 5 %
SI penult 3′x 87 ± 3 % U297C 118 ± 12 %
SI penult comp 109 ± 4 % A288G,U297C 93 ± 8 %
SI ult 5′x 106 ± 4 % SII top 3′x 40 ± 9 %c
SI ult 3′x 84 ± 4 %    x A288G 22 ± 4 %
SI ult comp 100 ± 4 %    x U297C 10 ± 3 %
   x A288G, U297C 45 ± 12 %
   x A136G 50 ± 3 %
   x A136C 32 ± 1 %
a

reported as the mean and standard deviation between four translation reactions from two independent transcriptions.

b

WT error is the mean deviation of WT from all duplicate translation reactions.

c

previously reported (Berry et al., 2010)