. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 7.

Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Aug 11;51(5):1353–1368. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0083)

Table 2.

A summary of linear regression models fitted to the data and their statistics.

Comparison	Linear regression equation	R²	df	F	p value
A4 vs. A5	A5 = 23.88 + 0.75 × A4	.778	1,21	70.07	<.001
A4 vs. A6	A6 = 29.87 + 0.73 × A4	.750	1,22	63.08	<.001
A4 vs. A7	A7 = 44.44 + 0.56 × A4	.496	1,23	23.62	<.001
A4 vs. A8	A8 = 62.05 + 0.36 × A4	.272	1,19	6.73	.018
A4 vs. A9	A9 = 41.58 + 0.65 × A4	.660	1,19	34.94	<.001
A4 vs. A10	A10 = 32.41 + 0.82 × A4	.560	1,14	16.51	<.001

Note. A4 to A10 refer to the accuracy of speech sound production in the group of pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients, each with 4–10 years of device experience.