Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Med Med Res. 2011 Oct;1(4):430–444. doi: 10.9734/bjmmr/2011/769

Table 4. CT values for mRNA transcripts in ovarian tissue (mean CT value).

Tissue
sample
γ-SYN ERαΔ3 ERα β-Actin
B1 28.3 37.2 31.0 19.9
OV1 30.3 45.4 38.3 24.9
OV2 29.6 34.3 28.9 22.7
OV3 29.8 37.3 33.5 23.8

B2 29.3 42.1 35.1 21.6
OV4 31.7 43.4 35.8 23.7
OV5 32.3 35.0 28.3 21.8
OV6 29.2 36.2 30.2 20.7
OV7 25.0 41.8 35.1 21.7

B3 27.3 38.0 29.9 21.4
OV8 22.9 35.9 29.7 20.5
OV9 28.4 32.3 28.1 20.5
OV10 25.4 36.0 29.6 20.7
OV11 23.5 32.6 27.0 20.3

B2 31.8 43.9 36.5 23.3
B1 30.5 38.9 32.3 20.3
B3 29.8 38.1 32.9 22.9
B4 30.1 36.1 30.2 23.1
B5 28.5 39.6 33.6 22.5
B6 29.0 37.5 33.0 22.5
B7 29.8 38.5 32.7 23.3

B2 28.7 39.5 32.7 21.0
B8 29.2 41.2 35.1 24.0
B9 27.4 40.5 34.3 25.6
B10 26.6 34.9 28.6 21.2
B11 27.1 36.8 30.6 20.4
B12 26.5 36.4 30.9 20.3
B13 35.4 33.7 31.3 27.3

This table presents the raw data required for the relative gene expression analysis shown in Table 3. The mean CT values of each gene investigated and the mean CT value of β-ACTIN (in brackets), is given for each patient. Gene expression analysis is performed by comparing β-ACTIN values with those of the gene of interest, relative to one ‘control‘ patient known as the calibrator in order to determine relative inter-patient differences. In this case benign tissues (patients B1, B2 or B3) were chosen as the calibrator control and consequently assigned a gene expression value of 1 in subsequent analyses (see Table 3A).