Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 1;138(23):5177–5188. doi: 10.1242/dev.067868

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

RhoA activity is necessary and sufficient for Shroom3 apical localization. (A,B) Immunofluorescent labeling of MDCK cells co-expressing exogenous Shroom3 (red) and regionally targeted versions of constitutively active RhoA (green). Nuclei are in blue. The xz plane allows visualization of the apical-basal axis and the xy plane a view of the apex or base. The xz view shows that VSVG-RhoAL63 (Ap-RhoAL63) is targeted apically (A) whereas Fcgr2b-RhoAL63 (Bl-RhoAL63) targets basolaterally (B). (C) Immunofluorescent labeling for ZO1 (green) of an MDCK cell expressing Bl-RhoAL63 (red). Nuclei are in blue. (D) xz plane of a field of MDCK cells labeled for ZO1 (green) and nuclei (blue) in which one is expressing Bl-RhoAL63 (red). In this cell, ZO1 labeling is adjacent to the adhesion substrate. (E,F) Immunofluorescent labeling of Shroom3 (E) or phospho-MRLC (F) in wild-type or mutant E10.5 lens pit cryosections. (G-I) The average pixel intensity following immunolabeling with Shroom3 (G) or phospho-MRLC (H-I) specific antibodies was quantified over apical-basal line intervals for control (gray) or mutant (red) genotypes. The means are calculated from 17 cells from at least four different lens pits. Statistically significant differences were evaluated by calculating P-values (see Materials and methods) for each pixel along the apical-basal axis. The blue line indicates the trend of statistical P-values subtracted from 1 and values greater than 0.95 (P<0.05) indicate regions in which a statistically significant difference in signal intensity is found.