Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2011 Jul 27;476(7360):298–303. doi: 10.1038/nature10351

Table 1.

Overview of cSNVs and confirmed somatic mutations in most frequently mutated genes

Cases Total
Gene NS S T NS S T Somatic cSNVs (RNA-seq cohort)* P (raw) q NS SP T SP Skew (M, WT, both) ***
MLL2 16 8 17 17 8 18 10 6.85×10-8 8.50×10-7 0.834 14.4 WT
TNFRSF14 G 7 1 7 8 1 7 11 6.85×10-8 8.50×10-7 7.52 118 both
SGK1 G 18 6 6 37 10 6 9 6.85×10-8 8.50×10-7 19.5 61.7 -
BCL10 2 0 4 3 0 4 4 6.85×10-8 8.50×10-7 3.62 112 WT
GNA13 G 21 1 2 33 1 2 5 6.85×10-8 8.50×10-7 24.1 25.7 both
TP53 G 20 2 1 23 3 1 22 6.85×10-8 8.50×10-7 15.6 14.1 both
EZH2 G 33 0 0 33 0 0 33 6.85×10-8 8.50×10-7 11.4 0.00 both
BTG2 12 6 1 14 6 1 2 6.85×10-8 8.50×10-7 23.9 35.1 -
BCL2 G 42 45 0 96 105 0 43 9.35×10-8 8.50×10-7 3.78 0.00 M
BCL6** 11 2 0 12 2 0 2 9.35×10-8 8.50×10-7 0.175 0.00 M
CIITA** 5 3 0 6 3 0 2 9.35×10-8 8.50×10-7 0.086 0.00
FAS 2 0 4 3 0 4 2 1.52×10-7 1.17×10-6 2.54 66.5 WT
BTG1 11 6 2 11 7 2 10 1.52×10-7 1.17×10-6 17.5 52.5 both
MEF2B G 20 2 0 20 2 0 10 2.05×10-7 1.47×10-6 14.2 0.00 M
IRF8 11 5 3 14 5 3 3 4.55×10-7 3.03×10-6 8.82 28.2 WT
TMEM30A 1 0 4 1 0 4 4 6.06×10-7 3.79×10-6 0.785 65.0 WT
CD58 2 0 3 2 0 3 2 2.42×10-6 1.43×10-5 2.29 69.2 -
KLHL6 10 2 2 12 2 2 4 1.00×10-5 5.26×10-5 5.42 16.4 -
MYD88 A 13 2 0 14 2 0 9 1.00×10-5 5.26×10-5 12.4 0.00 WT
CD70 5 0 1 5 0 2 3 1.70×10-5 8.48×10-5 7.08 44.0 -
CD79B A 7 2 1 9 2 1 5 2.00×10-5 9.52×10-5 10.9 18.3 M
CCND3 7 1 2 7 1 2 6 2.80×10-5 1.27×10-4 6.55 36.3 WT
CREBBP 20 7 4 24 7 4 9 1.00×10-4 4.35×10-4 2.72 6.04 both
HIST1H1C 9 0 0 10 0 0 6 1.80×10-4 7.50×10-4 11.9 0.00 both
B2M 7 0 0 7 0 0 4 3.90×10-4 1.56×10-3 16.6 0.00 WT
ETS1 10 1 0 10 1 0 4 4.10×10-4 1.58×10-3 5.76 0.00 WT
CARD11 14 3 0 14 3 0 3 1.90×10-3 7.04×10-3 3.37 0.00 both
FAT2** 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 6.30×10-3 2.25×10-2 0.128 0.00 -
IRF4** 9 4 0 26 5 0 5 7.00×10-3 2.41×10-2 0.569 0.00 both
FOXO1 8 4 0 10 4 0 4 7.60×103 2.53×10-2 4.02 0.00 -
STAT3 9 0 0 9 0 0 4 2.19×10-2 6.08×10-2 - - both
RAPGEF1 8 3 0 10 3 0 3 2.98×10-2 7.45×10-2 - - WT
ABCA7 12 3 0 15 3 0 2 7.76×10-2 1.67×10-1 - - WT
RNF213 10 8 0 10 8 0 2 7.87×10-2 1.67×10-1 - - -
MUC16 17 12 0 39 25 0 2 8.32×10-2 1.73×10-1 - - -
HDAC7 8 4 0 8 4 0 2 8.94×10-2 1.82×10-1 - - WT
PRKDC 7 3 0 7 4 0 2 1.06×10-1 2.05×10-1 - - -
SAMD9 9 2 0 9 2 0 2 1.79×10-1 3.01×10-1 - - -
TAF1 10 0 0 10 0 0 2 3.03×10-1 4.74×10-1 - - -
PIM1 20 19 0 33 34 0 11 3.40×10-1 5.23×10-1 - - WT
COL4A2 8 2 0 8 2 0 2 7.64×10-1 8.99×10-1 - - -
EP300 8 7 1 8 7 1 3 9.54×10-1 1.00 - - WT

Individual cases with nonsynonymous (NS), synonymous (S) and truncating (T) mutations and total number of mutations of each class is shown separately as some genes contained multiple mutations in the same case. The P values indicated in bold are the upper limit on the P value for that gene determined with the approach described by Greenman et al (see Methods)19, q is the Benjamini-corrected q value, and NS, SP and T SP refer to selective pressure estimates from this model for the acquisition of nonsynonymous or truncating mutations, respectively.

genes significant at an FDR of 0.03. SNVs in BCL2 and previously confirmed hot spot mutations in EZH2 and CD79B are likely somatic in these samples based on published observations of others.

*

Additional somatic mutations identified in larger cohorts and insertion/deletion mutations are not included in this total.

**

Selective pressure estimates are both <1 indicating purifying selection rather than positive selection acting on this gene.

***

“both” indicates we observed separate cases in which skewed expression was seen but where this skew was not consistent for the mutant or wild-type allele. Genes with a superscript of either A or G were found to have mutations significantly enriched in ABC or GCB cases, respectively (P< 0.05, Fisher Exact test).