Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chemosphere. 2011 Jul 8;85(6):943–947. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.060

Table 1.

Concentration and apparent rates of Bisphenol A migrating into water from bottles

ID Number Material Brand Conc. (ng ml−1) Migration (ng hr−1)
1 Polycarbonate Nalgene 0.306 ± 0.060 0.240 ± 0.033
2 0.178 ± 0.028 0.154 ± 0.021
3 0.199 ± 0.024 0.170 ± 0.017
4 0.251 ± 0.066 0.216 ± 0.044
1 Tritan™ Nalgene 0.007 ± 0.005 0.007 ±0.003
2 0.008 ± 0.002 0.005 ±0.001
3 0.008 ± 0.003 0.006 ±0.002
1 Stainless steel SteelWorks 0.026 ± 0.023 0.014 ± 0.007
2 Sigg 0.056 ± 0.018 0.043 ± 0.012
3 0.010 ± 0.004 0.009 ± 0.003
1 Al EcoCare™ Sigg 0.006 ± 0.003 0.005 ± 0.001
2 0.028 ± 0.008 0.021 ± 0.002
3 0.016 ± 0.001 0.014 ± 0.005
4 0.016 ± 0.001 0.013 ± 0.004
1A Al/Epoxy Sigg 0.140 ± 0.014 0.120 ± 0.005
2A 0.131 ± 0.019 0.151 ± 0.005
3A 0.091 ± 0.004 0.075 ± 0.001
4A 0.081 ± 0.015 0.065 ± 0.011
5A 0.104 ± 0.022 0.094 ± 0.006
6A 0.059 ± 0.019 0.044 ± 0.009
1B Al/Epoxy New Balance 1.902 ± 0.522 1.710 ± 0.311
2B 0.767 ± 0.058 0.658 ± 0.016
3B 0.931 ± 0.211 0.840 ± 0.080
4B 1.305 ± 0.979 1.072 ± 0.072

Values are shown ± standard deviation; n = 3; Al: aluminum; conc: concentration