Table 2.
Investigators 1 and 2 | Investigators 2 and 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cohen’s κ | Exact sig. | Cohen’s κ | Exact sig. | |
SST | 0.750 | 0.000*** | 0.739 | 0.05* |
WST | 1.000 | 0.071 | 0.667 | 0.400 |
WSTSST | 0.632 | 0.143 | 0.667 | 0.400 |
BST | 0.770 | 0.011* | 1.000 | 0.017* |
BSTSST | 1.000 | 0.05* | 0.739 | 0.033* |
WSTSST + BSTSST | 0.632 | 0.143 | 0.250 | 1.000 |
The results for the SST, BST and BSTSST showed statistically significant correlations (κ > 0.75)
BST bolus swallow test, BST SST saliva and bolus swallow test, WST water swallow test, WST SST saliva and water swallow test
Difference of the two investigators is significant p = 0.000–0.05 (bold values)