Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 22;20(6):1253–1264. doi: 10.1007/s11248-011-9490-1

Table 3.

Analysis of regenerated shoots from explants transformed with MYB10 or GUS gene construct and selected on kanamycin (50 mg/l) or not

Species Gene Kanamycin added No. of explants inoculated No. of shoots tested No. of shoots with visible phenotype (PCR +) No. of shoots without visible phenotype (PCR +) % transformation efficiency for visible phenotype*
Apple MYB10 No 150 29 14a (14) 15 (6) 9
Apple MYB10 Yes 95 25 19a (19) 6 (3) 20
Apple GUS No 150 53 3b 50 2
Apple GUS Yes 95 6 5b 1 5
Strawberry MYB10 No 50 23 3 (3) 20 (4) 6
Strawberry MYB10 Yes 50 31 5 (5) 26 (7) 10
Strawberry GUS No 50 18 0 18 0
Strawberry GUS Yes 50 16 1 15 2
Potato MYB10 No 150 27 10** (10) 17 (4) 7
Potato MYB10 Yes 75 28 13** (13) 15 (6) 17
Potato GUS No 150 30 13 17 9
Potato GUS Yes 75 33 18 15 24

These shoots were checked for visible phenotype red anthocyanin accumulation or blue GUS staining, and analysed by PCR for the presence of the MYB10 gene construct (number in brackets)

* Percentage of explants producing a shoot with a visible phenotype

** After incubation in acid methanol

Values with a differ significantly from b with P value < 0.05

nd not determined