Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 24;12(10):7250–7264. doi: 10.3390/ijms12107250

Table 3.

Difference between experimental and predicted Log P (ΔLog P) using ISET and the different methods studied (Ghose/Crippen, AlogP, MlogP, ClogP) for external group of alcohols.

No. Compounds Log Pexp ISET ΔISET
Log P
ΔGhose/Crippen
Log P
ΔAlogP ΔClogP ΔMlogP
01 1-Undecanol 4.42 12.3394 −0.22 0.7 0.26 −0.18 0.32
02 2-Undecanol 4.42 11.7816 0.14 0.6 0.33 −0.12 0.32
03 4-Octanol 2.68 9.2504 0.02 0.06 −0.1 −0.47 0.41
04 2-Methyl-1-butanol 1.14 7.2774 −0.26 −0.2 −0.15 −0.55 −0.07
05 2-Methyl-3-hexanol 2.19 8.2667 0.16 −0.04 0 −0.37 0.25
06 2.3-Dimethyl-3-pentanol 1.67 7.78 −0.05 −0.24 −0.27 −0.58 −0.27
07 4.4-Dimethyl-1-pentanol 2.39 8.6815 0.09 0.29 0.51 −0.28 0.45