Skip to main content
. 1999 Feb;119(2):435–444. doi: 10.1104/pp.119.2.435

Table IV.

Relative contents of Al and selected mineral nutrients in cell walls and vacuoles of maize root-tip cells (transverse sections 3 mm from apex)

Treatment Relative Contents
Al Si P S K Ca Mg
μm Al counts s−1
Cell Wall
 0 NDa 8.0 ± 2.0 (6.6–13) 19 ± 12 (7.8–26) 14 ± 3 (ND–19)  45 ± 22 (14–79) 5.4 ± 1.5 (3.3–8.2) ND
 20 ND 9.9 ± 5.0 (5.2–14) 29 ± 10 (12–50) 15 ± 2 (13–19) 55 ± 21 (15–82) 6.6 ± 2.8 (3.0–12) 1.0 ± 0.4 (ND–1.2)
Vacuole
 0  24 ± 16 (ND–52) 12 ± 1  (ND–13) 61 ± 32 (ND–120) 11 ± 4 (ND–16)  74 ± 43 (13–148) 9.9 ± 8.8 (4.4–27) 2.5 ± 0.2 (ND–1.2)
 20b 6.9 ± 1.8 (ND–9.6) 7.5 ± 1.9 (ND–9.7) 68 ± 65 (23–130) 13 ± 4.6 (6.3–24) 52 ± 19 (27–77) 4.1 ± 1.8 (1.1–7.1) 6.5 ± 5.0 (ND–9.6)
 20c 119 ± 43  (46–173) 193 ± 55  (120–229) 10 ± 1  (ND–11) 32 ± 9 (21–44) 73 ± 18 (46–97) 11 ± 3 (8.6–15) 6.4 ± 3.4 (0.6–12) 

Plants were exposed for 24 h to nutrient solutions with 0 (control) or 20 μm Al. All data are from freeze-substituted samples. Values are given as ranges (parentheses) and means ± sd; n ≥ 9 for control and n ≥ 15 for Al-treated plants.

a

ND, Not detected. 

b

Element composition of P-rich vacuolar deposits. 

c

Element composition of Si-rich vacuolar deposits.