Table 3.

Impact of neighbor’s attendance on own attendance: distance to VCT.

	All (1)	Females (2)	Males (3)
% Within 0–0.5 km	−0.093 [0.104]	−0.074 [0.129]	−0.119 [0.132]
% within 0–0.5 km * Distance to VCT	0.073** [0.033]	0.048 [0.044]	0.094** [0.037]
Distance to VCT	−0.073*** [0.026]	−0.077** [0.034]	−0.064** [0.028]
Observations	2767	1508	1259
R-squared	0.217	0.224	0.22
F-stata	31.300	23.414	21.294

Notes: The instruments used are the percent of neighbors that received various amounts of the incentives. Robust standard errors are clustered by village. Additional controls not presented here but included in the regression include: age, age squared, HIV status, whether the individual got an incentive, as well as the amount of the incentive received, a simulated average distance to the HIV results center, as well as district fixed effects. Asterisks denote the significance of the coefficients:

^***indicates significance at the 1% level;

^**significance at the 5% level; and

^*denotes significance at the 10% level.

^aThe F-test statistics reported are the Wald Weak Identification F-test statistic (Kleibergen-Paap).