Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;6(11):e26738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026738

Table 2. Estimated prey requirements of wild killer whales, based on two plausible values for calorie content of a typical, 4-year-old Chinook salmon.

Body Length “Calorie-rich” Chinook Scenario “Lean” Chinook Scenario
Scenario “100%” “100%” “Summer” “100%” “100%” “Summer”
(Source) fish (per day) fish ×103 (per year) fish ×103 (per year) fish (per day) fish ×103 (per year) fish ×103 (per year)
IWC NP Max 953 348 86 1640 599 147
IWC NP 99th 866 316 78 1489 544 134
IWC NP 95th 771 282 69 1327 484 119
IWC NP 80th 580 212 52 998 364 90
SeaWorld Max 559 204 50 963 351 86
SeaWorld 99th 545 199 49 938 342 84
SeaWorld 95th 493 180 44 848 309 76
SeaWorld 80th 410 150 37 705 257 63

Salmon of length 81 cm and mass 8.5 kg, the preferred size of Chinook prey of the resident killer whales [17]. Energy requirements predicted for southern resident killer whale (SRKW) population assume that activity levels are equal in captivity and in the wild. The “calorie-rich” scenario assumes an average energy density of 2,200 kcal/kg [44, p. 57)]; therefore each Chinook was estimated to represent 18,700 kcal. The “lean Chinook” scenario uses the mean of 5 Chinook of unknown size, collected in the Gulf of Alaska (mean = 5.35 kJ/g = 10,869 kcal/8.5 kg fish; [45]). Note that the row in bold type represents the most plausible estimate, based on observed body sizes from whaling records from the northeastern Pacific. The SRKW population in 2009 consisted of 87 individuals of the following age-sex classes (Center for Whale Research): females with calves (10); adult males (23); juveniles (15); calves (10); and adult females without calves (29).