Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2011 Sep 16;79(S10):107–118. doi: 10.1002/prot.23161

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of the performance of the best 12 groups in the latest 3 CASPs. Groups in each CASP are sorted according to the MCC score. CASP8 results are evaluated for both the full set of targets and the set without target T0500, a long, completely unfolded protein considerably influencing the scores. The reduced target set is marked with an asterisk in the legend. The scores in CASP9 are higher than in CASP7 but lower than in CASP8. The CASP8–CASP9 drop in scores may be attributed to the greater difficulty of targets in CASP9.