Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 5;24(6):979–992. doi: 10.1007/s10278-011-9368-z

Table 3.

PACS performance descriptives

Hospital A Hospital B All pilot respondents
Mean SD M Mean SD M Mean SD M
Clinical contribution
 C1 5.50 1.29 5.50 4.50 0.00 4.50 5.17 1.17 5.00
 C2 6.25 0.50 6.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 6.63 0.52 7.00
 C3 4.33 2.08 5.00 5.25 1.71 5.50 4.86 1.77 5.00
 C4 5.33 0.58 5.00 6.50 0.00 6.50 5.80 0.84 6.00
Organizational efficiency
 O1 4.75 0.96 4.50 5.00 0.00 5.00 4.86 0.69 5.00
 O2 3.00 1.41 3.00 6.33 0.58 6.00 5.00 2.00 6.00
Service construct
 S1 4.50 1.00 5.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 5.25 1.04 5.50
 S2 5.25 0.50 5.00 2.25 0.96 2.50 3.75 1.75 4.00
 S3 5.25 0.50 5.00 5.75 0.50 6.00 5.50 0.53 5.50
 S4 6.00 0.00 6.00 5.75 0.50 6.00 5.86 0.38 6.00
Technical information system
 T1 4.50 1.91 4.00 5.25 2.87 6.50 4.88 2.30 5.50
 T2 5.50 1.29 5.50 6.50 0.58 6.50 6.00 1.07 6.00
 T3 5.50 1.29 5.50 5.00 0.82 5.00 5.25 1.04 5.00

Productivity was calculated using the total amount of exams (and specified per modality) divided by the total capacity (i.e., FTE radiologists)