Table 3.
Sequence | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time [s] | |||||
LMA | 28 ± 21.4 | 19.7 ± 15.8 | 25.3 ± 25.9 | 22 ± 21 | 0.36 |
Cobra | 26.7 ± 18.4 | 34.8 ± 35.1 | 29.6 ± 25.3 | 35.9 ± 30.5 | 0.47 |
LT | 19.6 ± 13.4 | 20.74 ± 19.9 | 23.4 ± 13.9 | 23.8 ± 17.4 | 0.57 |
FT | 22.5 ± 25.1 | 15.7 ± 5.9 | 14.9 ± 5.7 | 18.4 ± 11.7 | 0.13 |
Attempts [n] | |||||
LMA | 1.36 ± 0.59 | 1.14 ± 0.35 | 1.22 ± 0.54 | 1.12 ± 0.53 | 0.31 |
Cobra | 1.37 ± 0.59 | 1.45 ± 0.78 | 1.37 ± 0.59 | 1.58 ± 0.77 | 0.52 |
LT | 1.25 ± 0.56 | 1.32 ± 0.58 | 1.36 ± 0.59 | 1.48 ± 0.7 | 0.46 |
FT | 1.02 ± 0.35 | 1.02 ± 0.16 | 1.02 ± 0.16 | 1.08 ± 0.28 | 0.19 |
No significant difference between LMA, Cobra, LT and FT regarding the sequence of use could be demonstrated for the time of insertion or the attemps needed. Data are presented as means +/- standard deviation