Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 24;19:60. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-60

Table 3.

Influence of sequence on insertion time and number of attemps

Sequence 1 2 3 4 P value
Time [s]
 LMA 28 ± 21.4 19.7 ± 15.8 25.3 ± 25.9 22 ± 21 0.36
 Cobra 26.7 ± 18.4 34.8 ± 35.1 29.6 ± 25.3 35.9 ± 30.5 0.47
 LT 19.6 ± 13.4 20.74 ± 19.9 23.4 ± 13.9 23.8 ± 17.4 0.57
 FT 22.5 ± 25.1 15.7 ± 5.9 14.9 ± 5.7 18.4 ± 11.7 0.13
Attempts [n]
 LMA 1.36 ± 0.59 1.14 ± 0.35 1.22 ± 0.54 1.12 ± 0.53 0.31
 Cobra 1.37 ± 0.59 1.45 ± 0.78 1.37 ± 0.59 1.58 ± 0.77 0.52
 LT 1.25 ± 0.56 1.32 ± 0.58 1.36 ± 0.59 1.48 ± 0.7 0.46
 FT 1.02 ± 0.35 1.02 ± 0.16 1.02 ± 0.16 1.08 ± 0.28 0.19

No significant difference between LMA, Cobra, LT and FT regarding the sequence of use could be demonstrated for the time of insertion or the attemps needed. Data are presented as means +/- standard deviation