Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 4;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-48

Table 3.

Comparison of the H-factor with cRMS, DOPE and QMEAN scores to assess models generated for CASP7 targets from the free-modeling category

CASP 7 target H-Factor (%) cRMS (Å) (a) DOPE (b) QMEANnorm (c)
T0356_D1 48 4.9 -8908 0.242
T0356_D2 48 4.9 -13013 0.209
T0316_D3 49 6.0 -5488 0.176
T0356_D3 49 4.9 -9274 0.285
T0316_D2 51 5.8 -2980 0.110
T0307_D1 62 5.5 -12623 0.385
T0307 63 6.0 -13816 0.407
T0309 65 5.5 -4613 0.180
T0314 65 5.4 -9248 0.372
T0296 67 5.6 -35782 0.260
T0299 67 5.9 -17649 0.334
T0306 68 4.8 -7884 0.287
T0316_D1 68 5.6 -16102 0.214
T0299_D2 69 6.0 -7742 0.302
T0316 69 3.8 -31249 0.172
T0299_D1 70 6.2 -7641 0.250

(a) cRMS (over Cα) between the average model and the actual experimental structure for the target.

(b) DOPE scores from MODELLER [94]

(c) QMEAN normalized score [95]