Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;24(3):1387–1400. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.3.1387-1400.2004

FIG. 9.

FIG. 9.

IP analysis comparing the recruitment of SR proteins by human ESE sequences alone (GAAGAAGA) as opposed to the full EDA exon. (A) Comparison of the two RNAs used in this experiment: the hTot RNA contains the ESE within its original context (nt 107 to 270), while the ESEx2 RNA contains two copies of the ESE element (flanked only by 8 nt of the EDA sequence) at the 3′ end of pBluescript II SK+ sequences (dotted line). Numbering on the ESEx2 construct refers to the distance from the T3 RNA polymerase promoter on pBluescript II SK+. A control RNA is also included. IPs (B) were performed with equal amounts of the UV cross-linked samples and with the different specific MAbs against SR proteins: SF2/ASF (MAb 96), the phosphorylated RS domain (MAb 1H4), and SC35 (anti-SC35). The leftmost gel contains the total UV cross-linked proteins prior to IP. (C) Comparison of the hTot RNA with a naturally occurring, 170-nt-long intronic region containing a GAAGAAGA sequence from IVS37 of the NF-1 gene. The numbering on the IVS37 construct refers to intronic nucleotide positions starting from the 5′ splice site of NF-1 exon 37. (D) IP profile of these two sequences with the same antibodies used in panel B. As above, the leftmost gel contains the total UV cross-linked proteins prior to IP. In all of the gels, the mobility of the SR proteins is indicated on the left. Samples were run on an SDS-11% PAGE gel and exposed to BioMax autoradiographic film.