Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 21;30(2):131–146. doi: 10.1159/000318845

Table 4.

CIBIC+ scores at week 24 – MMRM1 (ITT population)

Subject group Treatment group Number2 LSM SE Treatment comparison
difference3 95% CI P
APOE ε4 negative placebo 63 4.2 0.14 _ _ _
2 mg RSG XR 71 4.2 0.12 0.1 −0.3,0.4 0.663
8 mg RSG XR 66 4.1 0.11 0.0 −0.4, 0.3 0.891
10 mgdonepezil 28 3.9 0.22 −0.2 −0.7,0.3 0.4144

All except ε4/ε4 placebo 117 4.3 0.10 - - -
2 mg RSG XR 117 4.3 0.10 0.0 −0.3,0.3 0.913
8 mg RSG XR 114 4.1 0.10 −0.1 −0.4,0.1 0.276
10 mgdonepezil 49 3.8 0.17 −0.5 −0.8,-0.1 0.0254

Full population placebo 131 4.3 0.09 _ _ _
2 mg RSG XR 133 4.3 0.09 0.0 −0.2,0.3 0.939
8 mg RSG XR 127 4.2 0.10 −0.1 −0.4,0.1 0.307
10 mgdonepezil 56 3.8 0.16 −0.5 −0.8,-0.1 0.0094

The CIBIC+ rates global functioning with scores ranging from 1 (markedly improved) to 7 (markedly worse). A score of 4 represents no change and negative treatment differences reflect benefit in the active treatment over placebo. LSM = Least squares mean; SE = standard error for LSM.

1

Model includes terms for country group, visit, APOE ε4 gene dose, treatment, baseline body mass index, baseline MMSE score, baseline MMSE score by visit, and treatment by visit.

2

Number of subjects with a CIBIC+ score at week 24.

3

Difference (active treatment minus placebo).

4

Unadjusted p.