Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;48(2):525–532. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.2.525-532.2004

TABLE 4.

Proteome analysis of B. subtilisa

Proteinb Translational induction factorc
Function and/or similarityd
0.5× MIC, 20 min 1× MIC, 10 min
Ald 2.4 2.4 l-Alanine dehydrogenase
Dps 3.1 3.2 Stress- and starvation-induced gene controlled by sigmaB
FbaA 1.4 4.4 Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase
MinD 2.8 3.6 Cell-division inhibitor (septum placement)
PheS 2.3 1.7 Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (alpha subunit)
Spo0A 3.2 2.4 Two-component response regulator central for the initiation of sporulation
SpoVG 1.8 3.7 Required for spore cortex synthesis
Tpx 1.8 3.7 Probable thiol peroxidase
YceE 2.7 >10 Unknown; similar to tellurium resistance protein
YocJ 2.4 2.7 Unknown; similar to acyl-carrier protein phosphodiesterase
YodC 1.4 2.4 Unknown; similar to nitroreductase
YtxH 1.9 >10 Unknown; similar to general stress protein
YurL 2.1 2.3 Unknown; similar to ribokinase
YurPe 10.8 8.6 Unknown; similar to glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase
YvyD 1.9 >10 Unknown; similar to sigma-54 modulating factor of gram-negative bacteria
a

Cytoplasmic proteins produced by B. subtilis in response to treatment with compound 1 were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in the pI range of 4 to 7.

b

Proteins that were induced more than twofold in both experimental series and that accumulated to amounts sufficient for determination of their identity by peptide mass fingerprinting are listed.

c

Induction factors represent the ratio of protein synthesis results for the antibiotic-treated versus the control culture. Experiments were performed in duplicate. During each experimental series, two treatment conditions (0.5 times the MIC for 20 min and 1 times the MIC for 10 min) were analyzed. The induction factors correspond to the results of one representative experiment.

d

Functional annotation according to data from the SubtiList web server (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/SubtiList/).

e

In the antibiotic-treated as well as the control culture, YurP migrated in several spots on the gels, possibly due to protein modifications. The amount of all YurP spots increased in the presence of the antibiotic. The numbers refer to the YurP spot with the highest induction factor.