Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;48(2):392–395. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.2.392-395.2004

TABLE 3.

Variations in bacterial resistance rates during a before-and-after intervention trial that replaced CEP with piperacillin-tazobactam

Organism/phenotypic resistancea Resistance rate (%)b
Pc
Period 1 (baseline) Period 2 (intervention)
E. coli/CEP 11.5 (157) 8.3 (96) NS
K. pneumoniae/CEP 68.4 (38) 37.5 (40) 0.012
P. mirabilis/CEP 57.9 (38) 29.4 (51) 0.013
P. aeruginosa/CEP 5.7 (35) 6.2 (32) NS
P. aeruginosa/TZP 11.4 (35) 6.2 (32) NS
Acinetobacter species/TZP 21.7 (23) 23.1 (26) NS
S. aureus/MET 35.56 (107) 36.8 (68) NS
a

TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; MET, methicillin.

b

See program design in the text for details. Values in parentheses indicate the total number of strains.

c

That is, for period 1 versus period 2. NS, not significant.