Table 5.

Unadjusted comparison of process of care indicators between primary care payment models

Area of care	Process of care indicator	p-value	Pairwise comparison of models: OR [95% CI]
			Blended Capitation vs. FFS	CHC vs. FFS	Blended Capitation vs. CHC
Dyslipidemia	Lipid profile	0.30	1.2 [0.9-1.6]	1.0 [0.7-1.4]	1.2 [0.8-1.7]
	Lipid lowering drug	0.60	1.0 [0.7-1.5]	0.8 [0.5-1.2]	1.3 [0.8-2.3]
Diabetes	2 HbA1c tests	0.0008*	1.9 [1.3-2.8]†	2.5 [1.4-4.4]†	0.8 [0.4-1.4]
Chronic Kidney Disease	eGFR	0.66	1.4 [0.7-2.7]	1.1 [0.4-3.1]	1.3 [0.4-4.1]
Hypertension	2 blood pressure measures	0.80	1.1 [0.7-1.7]	1.2 [0.8-1.8]	0.9 [0.6-1.4]
	Anti-hypertensive drug	0.70	0.9 [0.6-1.3]	0.8 [0.5-1.4]	1.0 [0.6-1.8]
Weight	Waist circumference	0.003*	4.8 [2.4-9.7]†	1.9 [0.8-4.3]	2.6 [1.1-5.8]
	Smoking advice	0.001*	2.6 [1.6-4.3]†	1.6 [0.9-3.0]	1.6 [0.9-3.1]
Smoking Cessation	Smoking program referral	0.20	2.5 [1.0-6.2]	1.4 [0.6-3.3]	1.8 [0.7-4.3]
	Smoking drug therapy	0.005*	2.1 [1.3-3.3]†	0.8 [0.4-1.6]	2.7 [1.5-4.9]†

* p < 0.05: Indicates that payment model has a significant effect on the delivery of the specified indicator

^† p < 0.017: p-value limit for between group comparisons was corrected using a Bonferroni correction factor

OR = Odds Ratio, CI = 95% confidence interval on odds ratio