Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 24;12:409. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-409

Table 3.

The performance of four vector representing schemes for protein sequences

Organism Methods Benchmark negatives Random negatives

AUC Acc Sn Sp Pre AUC Acc Sn Sp Pre
E. coli AG-QP360 0.994 0.982 0.996 0.982 0.894 0.899 0.811 0.821 0.802 0.804

AG-CTF 0.996 0.968 0.987 0.940 0.889 0.886 0.797 0.794 0.799 0.798

AG-P100 0.994 0.965 0.989 0.979 0.889 0.889 0.799 0.798 0.799 0.799

AG-Q340 0.989 0.964 0.987 0.959 0.807 0.854 0.771 0.743 0.789 0.787

S. cerevisiae AG-QP360 0.993 0.968 0.998 0.969 0.786 0.960 0.902 0.887 0.929 0.917

AG-CTF 0.991 0.964 0.986 0.960 0.767 0.948 0.880 0.879 0.927 0.909

AG-P100 0.991 0.963 0.985 0.959 0.765 0.947 0.849 0.798 0.899 0.889

AG-Q340 0.989 0.945 0.982 0.939 0.684 0.902 0.844 0.788 0.898 0.877

Cutoff for each method was set according to the maximal F-measure statistic. Acc: accuracy; Sn: sensitivity; Sp: Specificity; Pre: precision.