Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2011 Nov;49(11):992–998. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318236384e

Table 2.

Odds ratios of individual-level race (ref = White) on in-hospital death and hospice use: results of the sequential models

Outcome In-hospital death Hospice use
Independent variables Na Pseduo-R2 Odds ratiob 95% CI Na Pseduo-R2 Odds ratiob 95% CI
Model 1: race and year of death 49048 0.01 2.13* 2.00 2.27 49048 <.01 0.62* 0.56 0.68
Model 2: Model 1 + demographics and health characteristics 48942 0.04 2.05* 1.92 2.19 48942 0.08 0.65* 0.58 0.71
Model 3: Model 2 + feeding tube status 48942 0.05 1.85* 1.73 1.98 48942 0.09 0.71* 0.64 0.79
Model 4: Model 3 + hospice use 48942 0.09 1.79* 1.67 1.92 NA
Model 5: Model 4 + DNR and DNH orders 48942 0.12 1.41* 1.31 1.51 48942 0.09 0.79* 0.72 0.88
Model 6: Model 5 + facility fixed effects 48860 0.11 0.95 0.87 1.04 43119 0.08 0.90 0.79 1.02
Goodness of fitc C-statistics = 0.720 C-statistics = 0.692
a

N differs in different models due to missing data. In model 6, facilities with 0% or 100% prevalence of each outcome were automatically dropped when estimating fixed-effects models. Sensitivity analysis has been done by repeating Models 1 to 5 on the samples used for Model 6. Estimation results are similar. Sensitivity analysis results are available upon request.

b

Odds ratios for individual-level race= Non-Hispanic Black(reference = Non-Hispanic White)

c

Goodness of fit is evaluated based on the fixed-effects models (Model 6).

*

p < 0.05