Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov;20(11):1743–1749. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2891

Table 1.

Prevalence and Odds of Intimate Partner Violence by Type of Abuse and Rurality Among Abortion Clients Screened for Intimate Partner Violence, Iowa, November 2006–July 2008 (n=1478)

 
 
Any IPVa
Physical and/or sexual IPV
Battering (current partner only)b
  n (%) n (%) ORc(95% CI) n (%) ORc(95% CI) n (%) ORc(95% CI)
All women 1478 233 (16.1)   180 (12.5)   97 (9.0)  
Urban/suburban 1074 (72.7) 163 (15.5) 1.0 (referent) 121 (11.6) 1.0 (referent) 72 (9.3) 1.0 (referent)
Large rural town 161 (10.9) 21 (13.3) 0.9 (0.5-1.4) 17 (10.6) 0.9 (0.5-1.6) 10 (8.2) 1.0 (0.5-2.0)
Small rural town 146 (9.9) 32 (22.5) 1.6 (1.03-2.5) 27 (18.8) 1.8 (1.1-3.0) 9 (8.0) 0.8 (0.4-1.8)
Isolated 97 (6.7) 17 (17.5) 1.2 (0.7-2.1) 15 (15.6) 1.4 (0.8-2.5) 6 (8.5) 0.8 (0.3-2.2)
a

Includes physical or sexual violence by a former or current partner and battering by a current partner.

b

Denominator for this analysis=1081.

c

Controls for age, race (white/nonwhite), health insurance (private, public, none), employment (yes/no), age (18–20, 21–24, 25–29, 30–34), and children <18 in the household (yes/no).

CI, confidence interval; IPV, intimate partner violence; OR, odds ratio.