Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 20;11:282. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-282

Table 2.

Organizational characteristics of Rural Health Units

Characteristic All Regions
(n = 307)*
Lower Egyptb
(n = 171)
Upper Egyptc
(n = 136)
# (%) # (%) # (%)

External Supervision
Facility received external supervision 304 (99.0) 171 (100.0) 133 (97.8)
within the previous 6 months 295 (96.1) 167 (97.7) 128 (94.1)
Checked registers/books 239 (77.9) 119 (69.6)bc 120 (88.2)bc
Discussed problems 194 (63.2) 94 (55.0)bc 100 (73.5)bc
Discussed policy issues 199 (64.8) 104 (60.8)bc 95 (79.9)bc
Discussed technology problems 121 (39.4) 65 (38.0) 56 (41.2)
held an official staff meeting 212 (69.1) 109 (63.7)bc 103 (75.7)bc
Observed individual staff at work 266 (86.6) 155 (90.6) 111 (81.6)
Recorded observations

Managerial processes
Facility has a management committee that meets every month or more 79 (26.0) 41 (24.3) 38 (28.1)
Facility keeps official records from the management committee meetings 24 (7.9) 17 (10.1) 7 (5.2)
Facility has a system for monitoring the quality of care that is delivered 45 (14.9) 32 (19.3)bc 13 (9.6)bc
Facility keeps written documentation of quality assurance activities 37 (12.1) 29 (17.0)bc 8 (5.9)bc
Facility has an approach for reviewing quality assurance activities 37 (12.1) 27 (15.8)bc 10 (7.4)bc

Community/patient involvement
Facility holds meetings with both facility managers and community members 51 (16.9) 36 (21.6)bc 15 (11.1)bc
Facility has a procedure to collect and report patient feedback 10 (3.3) 8 (4.7) 2 (1.5)
Facility has instituted changes within the previous 3 months, based on patient feedback 12 (3.9) 7 (4.2) 5 (3.7)

bc Lower Egypt facilities different from Upper Egypt facilities (p < 0.05)

* Percent calculated using non-missing as denominator [missing number range (0 - 6)]