Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2011 Nov 15;6(11):e26115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026115

Characterization of the Na+/H+ Antiporter from Yersinia pestis

Assaf Ganoth 1,#, Raphael Alhadeff 1,#, Dovrat Kohen 1, Isaiah T Arkin 1,*
Editor: Fatah Kashanchi2
PMCID: PMC3216949  PMID: 22102858

Abstract

Yersinia pestis, the bacterium that historically accounts for the Black Death epidemics, has nowadays gained new attention as a possible biological warfare agent. In this study, its NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter is investigated for the first time, by a combination of experimental and computational methodologies. We determined the protein's substrate specificity and pH dependence by fluorescence measurements in everted membrane vesicles. Subsequently, we constructed a model of the protein's structure and validated the model using molecular dynamics simulations. Taken together, better understanding of the Yersinia pestis NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter's structure-function relationship may assist in studies on ion transport, mechanism of action and designing specific blockers of NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter to help in fighting Yersinia pestis -associated infections. We hope that our model will prove useful both from mechanistic and pharmaceutical perspectives.

Introduction

NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporting, already postulated in 1966 [1], and confirmed experimentally in 1974 [2], is a key determinant in the homeostasis of pH and [NaInline graphic], the latter having an additional impact on cell volume as well. NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporters can be found ubiquitously in plants, animals and microorganisms, and are present in cell plasma membranes and in the membranes of many eukaryotic organelles [3]. The best characterized member of this bacterial family of proteins is the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter A, NhaA, present throughout the bacterial domain. NhaA members were reported to be selective for NaInline graphic and LiInline graphic [4] allowing them to detoxify the cell in case of LiInline graphic poisoning [5], and in other cases for KInline graphic as well [6].

Currently, the only crystal structure obtained for the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter family is the one of Escherichia coli NhaA, solved to 3.45 Å [7]. The structure reveals twelve transmembrane segments (TMSs) that are connected by outer-membrane loops. TMSs IV and XI are crossed and form an assembly made of two oppositely oriented Inline graphic-helices, each perturbed in its middle by a short unfolded stretch. There are two vestibules; a negatively charged one starting at the middle of the membrane, near the putative ion-binding site (D164) and opening out to the cytoplasm, and a smaller narrower vestibule spanning from the middle of the membrane toward the periplasm. The vestibules converge from both sides of the membrane into the TMSs IV/XI assembly; bearing in mind the non-canonical arrangement of unstructured coils inside the membrane, an important role for this assembly is implied. At the periplasmic side of the protein, the loop between helices I and II contains a Inline graphic-hairpin that forms together with the other loops a rigid periplasmic face parallel to the membrane. At its cytoplasmic side, many helices protrude into the cytoplasm forming a rough face.

The activity of the Escherichia coli NhaA is pH dependent; it is reduced by more than three orders of magnitude when pH is lowered from 8.5 to 6.5 [8]. This regulation is a common characteristic of many NaInline graphic/HInline graphic transporters and requires a “pH sensor”, which under different protonation states leads to conformational changes of the protein, affecting its activity [9], [10].

Previous mutation experiments showed that aspartic acid residues, which are located adjacent to the TMSs IV/XI assembly (D133, D163 and D164) are essential to NhaA's activity [11]. Recent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on Escherichia coli NhaA have suggested a possible mechanism for the ion exchange [12]. According to the proposed mechanism, D164 serves as the NaInline graphic -binding site while D163 serves as the molecular “switch” between the conformations of the protein.

The Yersinia pestis bacterium accounts for three huge pandemics since the sixth century with millions of deaths (including the Black Death, one of the most devastating pandemics in human history [13]) as well as numerous smaller epidemics and sporadic cases [14]. It is a gram-negative, facultative anaerobic, rod-shaped bacterium belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae that has been identified as the etiological agent of plague in humans and animals (for reviews see [15], [16]). Plague is still an endemic illness in many areas of the world, having potential devastating consequences [17]. Yersinia pestis is of special interest not only because of its illness causing ability but also due to its purposeful hazardous misuse for warfare purposes [18], being classified as a category A of potential biological weapon by the US Centers for Disease Control. Although the high clinical and pharmaceutical interest of Yersinia pestis, its major salt pump, the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter has never been investigated and its structure, substrate selectivity and pH dependence are yet to be determined. Therefore, this work addresses these issues.

The current study involves both experimental and computational analyses, in a synergistic manner, aimed to characterize the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter from Yersinia pestis. To account for the experimental part of this work, we first showed that Yersinia pestis NhaA confers full complementation to Escherichia coli bacteria lacking antiporter systems, otherwise unable to grow at the presence of NaInline graphic or LiInline graphic. We then used vesicles containing the NhaA protein, and followed fluorescence quenching to determine the protein's ion selectivity and pH profile. Secondly, based on the Escherichia coli NhaA crystal structure, we constructed an initial model for the Yersinia pestis NhaA protein's structure by means of homology modeling procedure. Then, we evaluated the quality of the structure by performing a series of atomic-level MD simulations and subsequent analyses. Taken together, we propose a prototype blueprint model structure and a biochemical characterization for the Yersinia pestis NhaA that can be considered as working tools to aid subsequent theoretical and experimental studies.

Results and Discussion

The goal of our work was characteriz ing the major salt pump from Yersinia pestis. Towards that end we cloned the NhaA homologue from Yersinia pestis and experimentally characterized its complementarity in Escherichia coli, ion selectivity and pH activity profile. Subsequently, we computationally examined the protein in detail using homology modeling and molecular dynamics simulations.

Experimental analyses

Cloning and functionality

As stated above, in Escherichia coli NhaA is the major NaInline graphic pump responsible for salinity and pH homeostasis. We therefore used the sequence of Ec-NhaA to search for homologous proteins in the Yersinia pestis KIM D10 genome [19]. A single hit was found that is 67% identical to the Escherichia coli protein with an E value of Inline graphic (see Figure 1). Furthermore, whole genome comparison did not reveal a Yersinia pestis homolog of the NhaB, NhaC and NhaD proteins.

Figure 1. BLAST sequence alignment between Escherichia coli NhaA (PDB entry 1ZCD) and Yersinia pestis NhaA (Entrez accession code NP_994981).

Figure 1

Stars, colons and dots refer to identical residues, conserved and semi-conserved substitutions, respectively. TMSs are sequentially indicated.

Since the two proteins share extensive sequence resemblance, we sought to test the functionality of the Yersinia pestis NhaA, by performing an in vivo complementation assay. We tested the protein's ability to allow growth, in the presence of stressing LiInline graphic or NaInline graphic ions, of bacteria that do not harbor any other antiporters [20]. As shown in Figure 2, we have found that Yersinia pestis NhaA confers full rescue to Escherichia coli bacteria lacking antiporter systems, which are otherwise unable to grow on NaInline graphic or LiInline graphic. This indicates that the sub-cloned Yersinia pestis NhaA gene encodes and expresses an active and readily functional protein. To obtain further insight into its activity characteristics, we further tested the Yersinia pestis NhaA in in vitro analyses as described below.

Figure 2. Na.

Figure 2

Inline graphic and Li Inline graphic complementation analysis of the Yersinia pestis NhaA. Yersinia pestis NhaA was expressed in the KNabc bacterial strain that does not contain any native antiporter [20]. Subsequently, the protein was examined for its ability to allow growth of the bacteria in 300 mM [NaInline graphic ] or 150 mM [LiInline graphic ], as indicated. Bacteria that did not harbor any antiporter were used as negative control, while expression of Escherichia coli NhaA was used as positive control.

Selectivity

In order to determine in vitro the protein's selectivity, we performed an activity assay examining different alkali ions as substrates (Figure 3 a). The activity was estimated from the change caused by each tested ion to the Inline graphicpH across the everted membrane as measured by the fluorescent probe acridine orange [21], [22]. After energizing the everted membranes with succinic acid, quenching of the fluorescence achieved a steady state level and then different ions were added to test their ability to activate the antiporter. To validate that the activity thrives from NhaA function, we tested the possibility of dequenching upon addition of NaInline graphic or LiInline graphic in the absence of NhaA. As expected, the fluorescence did not change when the antiporter was not present (see Figure S1). Conversely, when NhaA was present, upon addition of either NaInline graphic (black) or LiInline graphic (red) we observed a profound dequenching, indicating a major activation of the protein. Addition of KInline graphic (purple) or RbInline graphic (green) caused slight dequenching, implying that the protein is not completely selective against them, whereas CsInline graphic (magenta) did not evoke detectable dequenching at all. Hence, we report that the Yersinia pestis NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter is selective for NaInline graphic and LiInline graphic, but shows some leakiness for other alkali ions. This observation is most striking considering their radii vary two-folds, suggesting that geometrical considerations are not the sole determinants that govern selectivity. In conclusion, the antiporter from Yersinia pestis, in terms of selectivity, may represent an intermediate form between the strictly selective Escherichia coli NhaA [4] and the KInline graphic permissive antiporter from Vibrio parahaemolyticus [6].

Figure 3. NhaA activity assay in everted membrane vesicles.

Figure 3

Everted membrane vesicles activity was determined using acridine orange fluorescence to monitor Inline graphicpH. (a) Data of typical measurements are shown. At the onset of the reaction, succinic acid (0.6 mM) was added to energize the vesicles and fluorescence was recorded until a steady state level of Inline graphicpH (100% quenching) was reached. Then, 5 mM of NaInline graphic (black), LiInline graphic (red), KInline graphic (purple) RbInline graphic (green) or CsInline graphic (magenta) were added to evoke the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter. NhaA activation level was defined as the percentage of dequenching at steady state after adding NaInline graphic or LiInline graphic , from those 100%; (b) Michaelis-Menten kinetic fit. Activation of NhaA was measured at different NaInline graphic (black) and LiInline graphic (red) concentrations. Data points (Inline graphic) are shown in circles, while the fit is shown in solid lines.

Having established that the protein is mainly activated by NaInline graphic or LiInline graphic, we proceeded to determine the activation kinetics by measuring the protein's pumping activity as a function of NaInline graphic or LiInline graphic concentrations (Figure 3 b). We fit a Michaelis-Menten curve to our data (for both ions, the calculated RInline graphic of the fit was above 0.96) and obtained the following kinetic values: the Inline graphic and Inline graphic for NaInline graphic are Inline graphicM and Inline graphic (a.u.) whereas for LiInline graphic they are Inline graphicM and Inline graphic (a.u.).

Our calculated Inline graphic and Inline graphic values indicate that: (i) The Yersinia pestis NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter has about 4.5 times higher affinity to LiInline graphic over NaInline graphic. This is in accord with experimental [23], [24] and computational [12], [25] studies suggesting that the Escherichia coli NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter has a significant higher affinity for LiInline graphic over NaInline graphic; (ii) The affinity of the Yersinia pestis NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter is higher than that of the Escherichia coli NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter. This is reflected by lower Inline graphic values for both ions measured at the former Bacterium over the latter [25]. Hence, the Yersinia pestis NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter is a more potent and robust pump in terms of affinity, making it sensitive even to relatively low [NaInline graphic ] or [LiInline graphic ]. Finally, comparison of the Inline graphic values obtained for NaInline graphic and LiInline graphic shows that they are indistinguishable (see Figure 3 b). Hence the pump's preference for LiInline graphic over NaInline graphic is solely a function of differential affinity and not turnover.

pH dependence

The activity of NhaA from Escherichia coli is highly pH dependent [8]. Hence we decided to examine the pH activity profile of the Yersinia pestis NhaA as well. We measured the protein's activity at different pH values (Figure 4) using the fluorescence quenching method using NaInline graphic (black) or LiInline graphic (red) as a substrate ion (the ions' concentrations used for activation were chosen to be slightly higher than the calculated Inline graphic for each ion, using 1 mM for NaInline graphic and 0.2 mM for LiInline graphic). We have found that the Yersinia pestis NaInline graphic/HInline graphic is active at a pH range similar to that of the Escherichia coli NaInline graphic/HInline graphic [8], exhibiting no detectable activity at pH 6.5, and an activity increase when pH is raised from 7 to 8. A similar trend was observed for both ions. Since pH regulation is a common characteristic of many NaInline graphic/HInline graphic transporters, we conclude that the Yersinia pestis NaInline graphic/HInline graphic (like the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter from Escherichia coli [10] and Vibrio parahaemolyticus [6], [26]), is pH dependent and harbors a “pH sensor”, that forces conformational change of the antiporter and consequently affects its activity.

Figure 4. Effect of pH on the Na.

Figure 4

Inline graphic /H Inline graphic antiporter activity in everted membrane vesicles. Activity of the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter was estimated as described in Figure 3 at various pH values after addition of NaInline graphic (1 mM, black) or LiInline graphic (0.2 mM, red). Percent of dequenching (Inline graphic) due to cation addition is depicted versus medium pH. Note that at pH 6.5 no activity was observed for both ions.

Computational analyses

After having experimentally characterized the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter from Yersinia pestis we set forth to examine it computationally in order to attempt and put our results in a structural context.

Homology modeling

Homology modeling of membrane proteins is similar in nature to that of water soluble proteins. Furthermore, results obtained when homology modeling membrane proteins are as good as those obtained when modeling their water soluble counterparts [27]. Given that the Yersinia pestis NhaA shares a high identity (67%) and similarity (80%) with the Escherichia coli NhaA (E valueInline graphic), the latter was selected as a template for the homology modeling process (Figure 1). The extensive sequence resemblance between the proteins ensures a high success of the modeling process.

Model quality assessment

Prior to the MD simulations, the Yersinia pestis NhaA model structure was evaluated for its quality. The Ramachandran plot showed that 98.4% of the residues lie in allowed regions (from which 83.7% in the most favored regions). No major stereochemical clashes and bad contacts for main-chain or side-chain parameters were detected. Global analysis of the model with ProSA [28], showed a Z-Score of −1.49, implying no significant deviation from the template Escherichia coli NhaA structure. The Verify3D analysis [29], indicated a reasonably good sequence-to-structure agreement with an average score of 0.29. Thus, the resulted model of the homology modeling procedure (and before the MD simulations) was a relatively reliable structure.

Overall three-dimensional structure

The two structures of the protein from both bacteria highly resemble each other, and the Yersinia pestis NhaA displays all the distinguishing characteristics of the Escherichia coli protein (see Figure 5). The Yersinia pestis NhaA comprises of twelve TMSs; TMSs IV (orange) and XI (purple) form the unique assembly exactly as at the Escherichia coli protein, the N- and C- termini are exposed to the cytoplasm (see below), a funnel opens into the cytoplasm and continues to the middle of the membrane, a shallower funnel opens to the periplasm and is separated from the cytoplasmic funnel by non-polar residues that act as a barrier, the periplasmic face of the protein is flat owing to structured loops and the cytoplasmic face is rough with flexible loops and a few helices that protrude into the cytoplasm.

Figure 5. Schematic diagrams of a representative structure derived from one of the 20 ns simulations of the Yersinia pestis NhaA (gray) superimposed upon the x-ray structure (PDB entry 1ZCD) of the Escherichia coli NhaA (white).

Figure 5

TMSs IV and XI of the Yersinia pestis NhaA are colored with orange and purple and these of the Escherichia coli with green and blue, respectively.

Regulation of the antiporting activity of Escherichia coli NhaA requires a “pH sensor”, which was found to potentially include residues such as E78, E252, H253 and H256 [30]. These residues are located at the N-terminal side of the cytoplasmic funnel not only at the Escherichia coli template but also at the suggested model for the Yersinia pestis NhaA. A few key functional residues located at TMS II (D65), TMS IV (D133), TMS V (D163, D164) and TMS X (L296, G299, K300, G303) were found to play significant physiological roles at the Escherichia coli NhaA [7], [31], [32]. All these residues are conserved and fit exactly to the same helices at the Yersinia pestis NhaA model structure as well; furthermore, they maintain their orientation throughout the simulations of both proteins. Overall, the architecture of our suggested model for the Yersinia pestis NhaA retains the distinctive Escherichia coli NhaA characteristics.

To further validate the architectural similarity of the two proteins, we mutated the key residue, D164, to asparagine and tested the variant for complementation ability. The results of the complementation assay (Figure 6) show that bacteria expressing the mutant cannot grow in the presence of NaInline graphic or LiInline graphic. These results suggest that the mutation produces a nonviable protein, in line with the corresponding mutation in Escherichia coli [11].

Figure 6. Complementation assay of the D164N mutant.

Figure 6

Yersinia pestis NhaA wild-type and D164N mutant were expressed in KNabc bacterial strain that does not harbor any native antiporter [20]. Sections of plates using different cations, at 170 mM, as indicated, are presented.

Stability

MD simulations can be used as a tool to test the quality of homology modeled membrane proteins [33], [34]. In order to test the resulted model of the homology modeling procedure, we performed three independent MD simulations (each for a duration of 20 ns) of the protein when embedded in a membrane and at the presence of a physiological salt concentration. Representative structure from the MD simulations of the Yersinia pestis NhaA (gray), superimposed with the x-ray structure of the Escherichia coli NhaA (white) for comparison, are presented on Figure 5.

Several measures were employed in order to gauge the stability of the homology model-derived structure by analyzing three independent simulations. We measured the deviation of the simulated structure from the original structure, the fluctuation of the residues of the protein's model and its secondary structure.

Monitoring the time evolution of the system (Figure 7 a), revealed that the protein was relatively stable. Its CInline graphic RMSD values were pretty low during the course of the simulations, whereby all simulations diverged from the initial structure by a CInline graphic RMSD of 0.26–0.33 nm. The RMSD curve pattern implies that the structure did not substantially deviate during the simulations and were stable. This was further verified by following the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of the protein (Figure 7 b). Not surprisingly, the RMSF curves of the three simulations present relatively mild oscillations. Notably, the structural sections of the proteins, namely their twelve TMSs (which are marked by black horizontal bars and labeled with roman numerals at the bottom of Figure 7 b), are more rigid and confined and tend to be less flexible than other sections. Correspondingly, the proteins' unstructured sections show increased motility. Thus, at all simulations, the RMSF data indicate larger fluctuations of segments belonging to loops that connect the helices, as well as of residues located at the edges of the Inline graphic-helical sections or edges of the protein. Noteworthy, all three curves are quite similar to each other which implies that in all simulations the protein undergoes similar adjustments, supporting the internal convergence of the structural features and characteristics in the three trials. Finally, the dynamics of TMS X during the simulations is not typical for helical segments, and hence it has a relatively high RMSF among all the other TMSs. Inspection of its dynamics during the simulations revealed that it bent and tilted similarly to previous findings [35].

Figure 7. Analysis of structural parameters of the Yersinia pestis NhaA protein as a function of the 20 ns MD simulations.

Figure 7

(a) RMSD for the CInline graphic atoms; (b) RMSF, aligned by sequence, TMSs marked with horizontal bars; (c) Relative helix retention and (d) Accessibility of D164 to the vestibule's core. The different colors on each panel represent different trajectories, each represent an independent unbiased trial.

Next, we followed the helix retention of the protein as a function of time (Figure 7 c). The helix retention of the protein was similar and stable in all simulations; at one simulation the Inline graphic-helical content slightly increased by Inline graphic Inline graphic throughout the simulation time, whereas at the other two simulations marginally decreased to 97–99%. The high retention of the Inline graphic-helical content throughout the simulations time at all cases implies that the protein's secondary structure elements are steady, meaning that the TMSs do not unwind.

The entry of ions from the cytoplasm to the vicinity of the TMSs IV/XI assembly is performed through a vestibule that spans from the cytoplasmic face of the protein and ends in the middle of the membrane near D164 [7]. The mode of ion binding is most probably a direct attachment to the carboxyl group of the D164 side chain, presumably at its center [12]. Hence, we examined the accessibility of D164 to the vestibule's pore (Figure 7 d) by checking the dihedral angle of its rotamer (N-CInline graphic-CInline graphic-CInline graphic) in order to observe the availability and exposure of the ion-binding site to the vestibule's space. We have found that the average D164 rotamer's dihedral angle of the Yersinia pestis NhaA was stable and steady throughout the simulations (Inline graphic−70Inline graphic) enabling D164 to bind cations. Yet, at one simulation, at a short period of time, between 8.4 and 9.8 ns, the angle changed abruptly to Inline graphic−170Inline graphic due to a passing water molecule to which D164 was temporarily pointing. Nonetheless, it is evident that the most dominant rotamer is the one accessible for substrate binding from the vestibule.

Concluding Remarks

In this study, we have biochemically characterized the NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter from Yersinia pestis and implemented homology modeling and MD simulations aimed at suggesting a working structural model. Regarding the experimental branch of this study, we prepared everted membrane vesicles and performed fluorescence quenching assays to determine its substrate specificity and monitored its pH dependence. We have shown that the antiporter is selective for LiInline graphic and NaInline graphic over the other tested cations, and has a higher affinity for LiInline graphic over NaInline graphic. The Yersinia pestis NhaA activity is pH regulated; the protein is inactive at pH Inline graphic and its activation increases by Inline graphic-fold from pH 7 to 8. Using homology modeling, we constructed a preliminary model of the protein and evaluated its quality in three independent MD simulations to test relaxation convergence. We analyzed the overall three-dimensional structure of the protein while comparing it to the x-ray structure of the Escherichia coli NhaA (that was used as a template for the homology modeling process) and followed characteristics of its stability. Overall, the combined methodologies were used to gain a schematic illustrative structural model of the Yersinia pestis NhaA and decipher its function.

Up to now, rational design of NhaA inhibitors has not been reported, and therefore having a blueprint structure of the Yersinia pestis NhaA provides a basis for a functional analysis of the protein , such as de novo inhibitor design . An improved understanding of its function may ultimately aid design selective of blockers of NhaA, which can be useful due to the potential hazardous misuse of Yersinia pestis for biological warfare purposes. Considering that NHE1 (NaInline graphic/HInline graphic exchanger 1) and NHA2 (NaInline graphic/HInline graphic exchanger 2) [36], the human orthologs to the Yersinia pestis NhaA, bear no sequence similarity to Yersinia pestis NhaA, the latter may serve as specific potent medical target for inhibition with relatively minor undesired side-effects. However, the effect of blocking NhaA activity on the ability of Yersinia pestis to survive and replicate within the host cell subsequent to infection still needs to be validated, and hence its role as a potential medical target is yet to be proven. Nonetheless, due to the potential clinical importance of the Yersinia pestis NhaA protein (considering the lack of NhaB, NhaC or NhaD in Yersinia pestis) and the epidemiological need for NhaA inhibitors, we hope that our model and the biochemical characterization will be considered useful not only from a mechanistic perspective but from a pharmaceutical point of view as well.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Due to biological hazard considerations, the Yersinia pestis NhaA gene was cloned from the closely related Yersinia pseudotuberculosis bacterium (given by the late Prof. Z. Zelinger, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) using colony PCR with flanking primers. The gene was sub-cloned into a pBR322-derived plasmid regulated under NhaR [37] (given by Prof. E. Padan, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem). Using Stratagene's QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) we mutated the Yersinia pseudotuberculosis NhaA to fit the protein sequence of Yersinia pestis NhaA. The same kit was used to perform the D164N mutation . Plasmids bearing Yersinia pestis NhaA and an empty plasmid for control were transformed into Escherichia coli KNabc strain (TG1 derivative, Inline graphicnhaA Inline graphicnhaB Inline graphicchaA [20]) which is strongly inhibited by NaCl and LiCl. Plasmid amplification was done in Escherichia coli DH5Inline graphic cells. Growth media was Lysogeny Broth (LB) [38]. Antibiotics concentration was 100 Inline graphicg/ml ampicillin.

Vesicles preparation and fluorescence quenching

Everted membranes were produced using the technique introduced by Rosen and Tsuchiya [39] with the following steps: lysis buffer used contained 21% sucrose, 15 mM of Tris/HCl buffer at pH 7.5 and 150 mM of choline-chloride. Bacteria were grown overnight in LB medium, washed three times in lysis buffer, suspended in 5 ml/gr and broken once in a French Press at 900 psi (valve pressure). Broken bacteria solution was centrifuged at Inline graphic g for 20 minutes and the supernatant was further centrifuged at Inline graphic g for 20 minutes. The final pellet, containing the vesicles, was resuspended in lysis buffer with 1 ml/gr of original dry bacteria, and frozen in liquid nitrogen.

NhaA activity was measured by the quinacrine fluorescence quenching method [21], [22], using lysis buffer and 2.4 Inline graphicM of Acridine Orange. Succinic acid (0.6 mM) was used to energize the vesicles. 100% quenching was defined as the difference in fluorescence between the level prior to addition of succinic acid and the level after a steady state was achieved. NhaA activation level was defined as the fraction of dequenching at steady state after substrate addition, relative to 100% quenching previously defined. Fluorescence readings were obtained by excitation at 366 nm and emission at 531 nm using the Perkin-Elmer LS-45 luminescence spectrophotometer.

Kinetic analysis was done using the fluorescence quenching results. Activations under different ion concentrations were plotted together using a Michaelis-Menten simple enzyme kinetic model [40]. Regression was performed using the non-linear least sum of squares technique. Statistical data were obtained using the bootstrapping method on the entire dataset, consisting of 3 repeats for the data points indicated and several more data points randomly distributed. The bootstrapping process was done by running a 1000 cycles and its convergence was evaluated using standard statistical procedures.

Homology modeling

The template used to model NhaA from Yersinia pestis (Entrez accession code NP_994981) was NhaA from Escherichia coli (PDB entry 1ZCD, chain A). The amino acid sequences of the NhaA from both bacteria were aligned using BLAST [41], [42] with the blastp algorithm. Homology models were generated with Modeller 9.4 [43]. The model with the best score was assessed for its quality with respect to its energy and stereochemical geometry using Procheck 3.5.4 [44], [45], ProSA-Web [28], [46] and Verify3D [29].

System set-up

The model with the best score was inserted into a pre-equilibrated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE) bilayer (adopted and modified from [47]). The insertion was done so that the protein's rough axis is perpendicular to the membrane surface plane, and all colliding lipids and water molecules, within 2 Å of the protein, were removed. Extending, outside membrane, protein edge terminals were deleted. KInline graphic and ClInline graphic ions were added to a final concentration of 0.1 M, with a system net-charge of zero, randomly distributed. Finally, the system was subjected to rigorous energy minimization using the steepest descent algorithm and tolerance of 1000 kJInline graphicmolInline graphic Inline graphicnmInline graphic, followed by a minimization using the conjugated gradient algorithm with a sequential decreasing convergence from 100 to 10 kJInline graphicmolInline graphic Inline graphicnmInline graphic. Then, an equilibration stage under positional restraints using a harmonic force constant was conducted. The equilibration procedure began with a force constant of k = 1000 kJInline graphicmolInline graphic Inline graphicnmInline graphic for 100 ps, then a force constant of k = 500 kJInline graphicmolInline graphic Inline graphicnmInline graphic for 100 ps, and another 100 ps of an unrestrained MD run. This allowed the lipids and water to pack more tightly around the protein, and enable the protein gradual relaxation in the membrane. After the positional restraint equilibration, the systems were submitted for unbiased MD runs.

MD details

The systems were subjected to three trials of a 20 ns MD simulation each, in order to test their convergence. The simulations were conducted using version 3.3.1 of the GROMACS package [48], [49], employing an extended version of the GROMOS53a6 force field [50]. The simulations were conducted using the LINCS algorithm [51] to constrain bond lengths and angles of hydrogen atoms, allowing a time step of 2 fs. Simulations were run using Berendsen temperature coupling at 310 K employing a coupling constant of Inline graphic = 0.1 ps. Pressure was kept constant at 1 bar by applying semi-isotropic coupling with a coupling constant of Inline graphic = 1 ps, differentiating the z-axis (the membrane normal). A cutoff of 1.2 nm was used for van der Waals interactions; long range electrostatic interactions were computed using the PME algorithm [52].

Visualization and analysis

The simulations were visualized with the Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) program [53]. The analyses were conducted using in-house VMD Tcl scripts, in-house purpose written perl scripts, and the GROMACS analysis package tools.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Basal response of everted membrane vesicles in the acridine orange fluorescence dequenching. The bacteria do not contain any NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter. For details see figure 3 in the main text.

(TIF)

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported in part by grants from The Lady Davis Fellowship Trust and The Valazzi-Pikovsky Fellowship Fund (to A.G.), The Rudin Fellowship Trust (to R.A.), the Amirim Teva program (to D.K.) and the Israeli Science Foundation (784/01, 1249/05, 1581/08 to I.T.A.). I.T.A. is the Arthur Lejwa Professor of Structural Biochemistry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Mitchell P. Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1966;41:445–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1966.tb01501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.West IC, Mitchell P. Proton/sodium ion antiport in escherichia coli. Biochem J. 1974;144:87–90. doi: 10.1042/bj1440087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Orlowski J, Grinstein S. Diversity of the mammalian sodium/proton exchanger SLC9 gene family. Pugers Arch. 2004;447:549–65. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Padan E, Tzubery T, Herz K, Kozachkov L, Rimon A, et al. NhaA of Escherichia coli, as a model of a pH-regulated Na+/H+ antiporter. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1658:2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Inaba K, Kuroda T, Shimamoto T, Kayahara T, Tsuda M, et al. Lithium toxicity and Na+(Li+)-H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. Biol Pharm Bull. 1994;17:573–580. doi: 10.1248/bpb.17.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Radchenko MV, Waditee R, Oshimi S, Fukuhara M, Takabe T, et al. Cloning, functional expression and primary characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus K+/H+ antiporter genes in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59:651–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04966.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hunte C, Screpanti E, Venturi M, Rimon A, Padan E, et al. Structure of a Na+/H+ antiporter and insights into mechanism of action and regulation by pH. Nature. 2005;435:1197–202. doi: 10.1038/nature03692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taglicht D, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Overproduction and purification of a functional na+/h+ antiporter coded by nhaa (ant) from escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:11289–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lacroix J, Poët M, Maehrel C, Counillon L. A mechanism for the activation of the Na/H exchanger NHE-1 by cytoplasmic acidification and mitogens. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:91–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Padan E, Bibi E, Ito M, Krulwich TA. Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: new insights. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1717:67–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Inoue H, Noumi T, Tsuchiya T, Kanazawa H. Essential aspartic acid residues, Asp-133, Asp- 163 and Asp-164, in the transmembrane helices of a Na+/H+ antiporter (NhaA) from Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1995;363:264–8. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00331-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arkin IT, Xu H, Jensen MØ, Arbely E, Bennett ER, et al. Mechanism of Na+/H+ antiporting. Science. 2007;317:799–803. doi: 10.1126/science.1142824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alchon A. 2003. 21 A pest in the land: new world epidemics in a global perspective, University of New Mexico Press. 1st edition.
  • 14.Zietz BP, Dunkelberg H. The history of the plague and the research on the causative agent Yersinia pestis. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2004;207:165–78. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Titball R, Hill J, Lawton D, Brown K. Yersinia pestis and plague. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2003;31:104–107. doi: 10.1042/bst0310104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rollins SE, Rollins SM, Ryan ET. Yersinia pestis and the plague. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(Suppl):S78–85. doi: 10.1309/DQM9-3R8Q-NQWB-FYU8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Josko D. Yersinia pestis: still a plague in the 21st century. Clin Lab Sci. 2004;17:25–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pohanka M, Skládal P. Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis. The most important bacterial warfare agents - review. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2009;54:263–72. doi: 10.1007/s12223-009-0046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Deng W, Burland V, Plunkett G, 3rd, Boutin A, Mayhew GF, et al. Genome sequence of yersinia pestis kim. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:4601–11. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.16.4601-4611.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nozaki K, Inaba K, Kuroda T, Tsuda M, Tsuchiya T. Cloning and sequencing of the gene for Na+/H+ antiporter of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;222:774–9. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schuldiner S, Rottenberg H, Avron M. Determination of pH in chloroplasts. 2. Fluorescent amines as a probe for the determination of pH in chloroplasts. Eur J Biochem. 1972;25:64–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1972.tb01667.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schuldiner S, Fishkes H. Sodium-proton antiport in isolated membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1978;17:706–11. doi: 10.1021/bi00597a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Padan E, Maisler N, Taglicht D, Karpel R, Schuldiner S. Deletion of ant in Escherichia coli reveals its function in adaptation to high salinity and an alternative Na+/H+ antiporter system(s). J Biol Chem. 1989;264:20297–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zuber D, Krause R, Venturi M, Padan E, Bamberg E, et al. Kinetics of charge translocation in the passive downhill uptake mode of the Na+/H+ antiporter NhaA of Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1709:240–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2005.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alhadeff R, Ganoth A, Krugliak M, Arkin IT. Molecular basis of Na+/H+ antiporter selectivity. Under review.
  • 26.Ganoth A, Alhadeff R, Arkin IT. Computational study of the Na+/H+ antiporter from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Mol Model. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s00894-010-0883-5. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Forrest LR, Tang CL, Honig B. On the accuracy of homology modeling and sequence alignment methods applied to membrane proteins. Biophys J. 2006;91:508–17. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.082313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W407–W410. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lüthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 1992;356:83–5. doi: 10.1038/356083a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Olkhova E, Kozachkov L, Padan E, Michel H. Combined computational and biochemical study reveals the importance of electrostatic interactions between the “pH sensor” and the cation binding site of the sodium/proton antiporter NhaA of Escherichia coli. Proteins. 2009;76:548–59. doi: 10.1002/prot.22368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kozachkov L, Herz K, Padan E. Functional and structural interactions of the transmembrane domain X of NhaA, Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli, at physiological pH. Biochemistry. 2007;46:2419–30. doi: 10.1021/bi602393s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Herz K, Rimon A, Olkhova E, Kozachkov L, Padan E. Transmembrane segment II of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter lines the cation passage, and Asp65 is critical for pH activation of the antiporter. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:2211–20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.047134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Capener CE, Shrivastava IH, Ranatunga KM, Forrest LR, Smith GR, et al. Homology modeling and molecular dynamics simulation studies of an inward rectfier potassium channel. Biophys J. 2000;78:2929–42. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76833-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ivetac A, Sansom MSP. Molecular dynamics simulations and membrane protein structure quality. Eur Biophys J. 2008;37:403–9. doi: 10.1007/s00249-007-0225-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Olkhova E, Padan E, Michel H. The inuence of protonation states on the dynamics of the NhaA antiporter from Escherichia coli. Biophys J. 2007;92:3784–91. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.098269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xiang M, Feng M, Muend S, Rao R. A human na+/h+ antiporter sharing evolutionary origins with bacterial nhaa may be a candidate gene for essential hypertension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:18677–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707120104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rahav-Manor O, Carmel O, Karpel R, Taglicht D, Glaser G, et al. NhaR, a protein homologous to a family of bacterial regulatory proteins (LysR), regulates nhaA, the sodium proton antiporter gene in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:10433–10438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bertani G. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1951;62:293–300. doi: 10.1128/jb.62.3.293-300.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tsuchiya T, Rosen BP. Characterization of an active transport system for calcium in inverted membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1975;250:7687–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Michaelis L, Menten ML. Kinetics of invertase action. Biochem Z. 1913;49:333–369. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993;234:779–815. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Morris AL, MacArthur MW, Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM. Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates. Proteins. 1992;12:345–64. doi: 10.1002/prot.340120407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Laskowski R, Macarthur M, Moss D, Thornton J. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 1993;26:283–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sippl MJ. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins. 1993;17:355–62. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tieleman DP, Berendsen HJ. A molecular dynamics study of the pores formed by Escherichia coli OmpF porin in a fully hydrated palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer. Biophys J. 1998;74:2786–801. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77986-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, et al. GROMACS: fast, exible, and free. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:1701–18. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Berendsen H, van der Spoel D, vandrunen R. GROMACS - a message - passing parallel molecular-dynamics implementation. Comp Phys Comm. 1995;91:43–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Siu SWI, Vácha R, Jungwirth P, Böckmann RA. Biomolecular simulations of membranes: physical properties from different force fields. J Chem Phys. 2008;128:125103. doi: 10.1063/1.2897760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen H, Fraaije J. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem. 1997;18:1463–1472. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N-log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:10089–10092. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996;14:33–38. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Basal response of everted membrane vesicles in the acridine orange fluorescence dequenching. The bacteria do not contain any NaInline graphic/HInline graphic antiporter. For details see figure 3 in the main text.

(TIF)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES