TABLE 2.
Susceptibility results for ESBL-positive isolates by BMD
| Isolate | MIC in μg/ml (isolate resistance categorya)
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAZ | CAZ+CAb | CTX | CTX+CA | CRO | CRO+CAc | ATM | ATM+CAc | CPD | CPD+CAc | |
| Citrobacter amalonaticus 4026 | 2 (S) | 0.5 | 8 (S) | 0.5 | >64 (R) | 0.5 | >64 (R) | 16 | 8 (R) | 2 |
| Citrobacter freundii 3757 | 128 (R) | 2 | 64 (R) | 0.5 | 64 (R) | 2 | >64 (R) | 0.25 | 128 (R) | 8 |
| Enterobacter aerogenes 3701 | 4 (S) | 0.25 | 4 (S) | ≤0.03 | 4 (S) | ≤0.06 | 4 (S) | ≤0.03 | 32 (R) | ≤0.06 |
| Enterobacter cloacae 53 | 32 (R) | 0.12 | 16 (I) | 0.06 | 16 (I) | ≤0.06 | 64 (R) | 0.5 | 32 (R) | 0.5 |
| Enterobacter cloacae 3146 | 128 (R) | 0.5 | 16 (I) | 0.5 | 32 (I) | 0.5 | >64 (R) | 0.25 | 64 (R) | 2 |
| Proteus mirabilis 3750 | 32 (R) | 0.12 | 0.5 (S) | ≤0.03 | ≤0.06 (S) | ≤0.06 | 0.25 (S) | ≤0.03 | 8 (R) | ≤0.06 |
| Proteus penneri 1767 | 0.12 (S) | 0.12 | 16 (I) | ≤0.03 | >64 (R) | ≤0.06 | 0.06 (S) | ≤0.03 | 32 (R) | ≤0.06 |
| Proteus vulgaris 1781 | ≤0.06 (S) | ≤0.06 | 1 (S) | ≤0.03 | 64 (R) | ≤0.06 | ≤0.03 (S) | ≤0.03 | 1 (S) | 0.12 |
| Proteus vulgaris 1405 | ≤0.06 (S) | ≤0.06 | 8 (S) | ≤0.03 | >64 (R) | ≤0.06 | ≤0.03 (S) | ≤0.03 | 128 (R) | ≤0.06 |
| Proteus vulgaris 1699 | ≤0.06 (S) | ≤0.06 | 32 (I) | ≤0.03 | >64 (R) | ≤0.06 | ≤0.03 (S) | ≤0.03 | 128 (R) | ≤0.06 |
| Proteus vulgaris 1765 | ≤0.06 (S) | ≤0.06 | 2 (S) | 0.06 | >64 (R) | ≤0.06 | ≤0.03 (S) | ≤0.03 | >128 (R) | 0.12 |
| Serratia marcescens 91 | 128 (R) | 0.25 | >64 (R) | 2 | >64 (R) | 2 | >64 (R) | 1 | >128 (R) | 4 |
| Serratia marcescens 167 | 64 (R) | 0.25 | 64 (R) | 1 | >64 (R) | 0.5 | >64 (R) | 1 | >128 (R) | 4 |
| Serratia rubidaea 3139 | 64 (R) | 1 | 0.25 (S) | 0.5 | 0.5 (S) | 0.12 | 2 (S) | 0.25 | 4 (I) | 0.25 |
| Serratia rubidaea 3134 | 32 (R) | 1 | 0.5 (S) | 0.25 | 0.5 (S) | 0.25 | 2 (S) | 0.25 | 2 (S) | 0.5 |
S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant.
A fixed concentration of 4 μg of CA per ml was used in conjunction with each antimicrobial agent.
CRO+CA, ATM+CA, and CPD+CA are not recommended by NCCLS as ESBL confirmatory tests.