Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 5;401(10):3045–3067. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Summary of key diagnostic plots of the PMF results for an HR-ToF-AMS dataset acquired in New York in 2009 (the PMF results are given in Fig. 2): (a) Q/Q exp as a function of number of factors (P) selected for PMF modeling. For the five-factor solution (i.e., the best P): (b) Q/Q exp as a function of FPEAK, (c) fractions of OA factors vs. FPEAK, (d) correlations among PMF factors, (e) the box and whiskers plot showing the distributions of scaled residuals for each m/z, (f) time series of the measured organic mass and the reconstructed organic mass (= LV-OOA + SV-OOA + NOA + COA + HOA), (g) variations of the residual (= measured − reconstructed) of the fit, (h) the Q/Q exp for each point in time, and (i) the Q/Q exp values for each m/z. (Adapted from Ref. [39])