Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan;42(1):60–64. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.60-64.2004

TABLE 3.

Mixed-culture (i.e., two to three different types of pathogen) results for which CHROMagar and conventional plates failed to agree on interpretation

Organisms No. of occasions Medium with correct interpretation Description of inconsistency
Proteus sp. and Klebsiella oxytoca 1 Blood agar-MacConkey Not detected on COa
Escherichia coli and Proteus sp. 1 Blood agar-MacConkey Proteus not detected on COa
Escherichia coli and Klebsiella oxytoca 1 Blood agar-MacConkey Escherichia coli not detected on COa
Leclercia sp. and Klebsiella oxytoca 1 Blood agar-MacConkey Klebsiella oxytoca not detected on COa
Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and enterococci 1 CO Escherichia coli not detected on BAPa
Escherichia coli and Proteus sp. 1 CO Two morphotypes worked up on bench that turned out to be the same species on CO
Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus 1 CO CFU of Escherichia coli was below threshold on BAPa
Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis 1 CO Reported as “mixed flora” by routine medium cultures
Enterobacter cloacae and viridans streptococci 1 CO Two morphotypes of E. cloacae worked up on bench that turned out to be the same species on CO
S. aureus, Enterococcus sp., and group B streptococci 1 CO Enterococcus sp. not detected on BAP
E. faecalis, S. aureus, and yeast sp. 1 CO Enterococcus sp. not detected on BAP; lower CFU on conventional media, reported as “mixed flora”
a

Most discrepancies were based on differences in CFU counts. Observations of urine plating by paratechnical personnel showed varying expertise, and this likely accounts for most of the discrepancies.