Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr A. 2007 Dec 7;1182(1):41–55. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.104

Table 5.

LSER Coefficients on Different Stationary Phases in 50/50 MeCN/H2O

Stationary Phase log k’0a LSER Coefficients R2b S.E. c
v s a b r
HC-C8d,e,f −0.33 ±0.06 1.27 ±0.07 −0.16 ±0.05 −0.58 ±0.05 −1.48 ±0.07 0.20 ±0.06 0.991 0.04
SO3-HC-C8-Ld,e,g −0.47 ±0.05 1.22 ±0.06 −0.14 ±0.04 −0.55 ±0.04 −1.42±0.06 0.20 ±0.06 0.991 0.04
Zorbax C8f,h −0.25 ±0.05 1.41 ±0.06 −0.27 ±0.05 −0.42 ±0.05 −1.61 ±0.07 0.02 ±0.06 0.993 0.04
PRPf,h 0.03 ±0.07 1.35 ±0.08 −0.39 ±0.06 −0.94 ±0.06 −1.89 ±0.08 0.48 ±0.07 0.994 0.05
Phenylf,h −0.22 ±0.06 0.83 ±0.07 −0.15 ±0.05 −0.34 ±0.05 −0.99 ±0.07 0.09 ±0.07 0.980 0.04
a

The intercept of the regression of Eq. (7)

b

The squared correlation coefficient of the regression of Eq. (7)

c

The standard error of the regression of Eq. (7)

d

Phase designation is the same as in Table 1

e

HC phase after gradient washing

f

Chromatographic conditions: 50/50 MeCN/H2O, T = 30 °C, other chromatographic conditions see reference [61,65].

g

Chromatographic conditions: 50/50 MeCN/ H2O with 0.02% TFA, T = 30 °C, F = 1.0 mL/min.

h

Data adapted from reference [61,65]