Table 1.
Important outcomes | Carboxyhaemoglobin levels, neurological sequelae, mortality, adverse effects | ||||||||
Number of studies (participants) | Outcome | Comparison | Type of evidence | Quality | Consistency | Directness | Effect size | GRADE | Comment |
What are the effects of oxygen treatments for acute carbon monoxide poisoning? | |||||||||
2 (367) | Neurological sequelae | Hyperbaric oxygen 100% v oxygen 100% given by non-re-breather mask in mild to moderate poisoning | 4 | –1 | 0 | –2 | 0 | Very low | Quality point deducted for lack of blinding. Directness points deduced for uncertainty about definition of outcome and inclusion of differing severities of CO poisoning |
1 (152) | Neurological sequelae | Hyperbaric oxygen 100% v normobaric oxygen 100% in moderate to severe poisoning | 4 | –2 | 0 | –1 | 0 | Very low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and methodological weaknesses (possible bias). Directness point deducted for disparity between groups at baseline in number of people with cerebellar abnormalities |
1 (139) | Neurological sequelae | Hyperbaric oxygen 100% interspersed with normobaric oxygen v normobaric oxygen 100% in moderate to severe poisoning | 4 | –2 | 0 | –2 | 0 | Very low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and methodological weaknesses (change in definition of outcome during trial). Directness points deducted for disparity in high Mini-Mental scores at baseline and for unclear reporting of numbers of sessions of treatment given and pressures/durations of hyperbaric treatment |
Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = Observational Consistency: similarity of results across studies Directness: generalisability of population or outcomes Effect size: based on relative risk or odds ratio