Ref (type) | Population | Outcome, Interventions | Results and statistical analysis | Effect size | Favours |
Healing rates | |||||
Systematic review |
Number of participants unclear (see further information on studies) Data from 1 RCT |
Median change in total ulcer surface area
mean 15 days
–1.2 cm2 with air-fluidised supports +0.5 cm2 with standard care |
Reported as significant P value not reported |
Effect size not calculated | air-fluidised supports |
Systematic review |
Number of participants unclear (see further information on studies) Data from 1 RCT |
Median change in total ulcer surface area
mean 15 days
with air-fluidised support with standard care Absolute results not reported |
P = 0.05 |
Effect size not calculated | air-fluidised support |
Systematic review |
97 people being cared for at home Data from 1 RCT |
Median change in total ulcer surface area
36 weeks
with air-fluidised support with standard care Absolute results not reported |
Reported as not significant P value not reported This RCT had a 13% withdrawal rate and did not perform an intention-to-treat analysis |
Not significant | |
Systematic review |
72 people, 65 people completed study, aged >18 years, acute care, grade I to IV ulcers |
Median change in wound surface area
–1.2 cm2 with air-fluidised mattress +0.5 cm2 with alternating-pressure mattress covered in foam |
95% CI for difference –9.2 cm2 to –0.6 cm2 P = 0.01 |
Effect size not calculated | air-fluidised mattress |