Skip to main content
. 2011 May 5;2011:1901.
Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Healing rates

Systematic review
Number of participants unclear (see further information on studies)
Data from 1 RCT
Median change in total ulcer surface area mean 15 days
–1.2 cm2 with air-fluidised supports
+0.5 cm2 with standard care

Reported as significant
P value not reported
Effect size not calculated air-fluidised supports

Systematic review
Number of participants unclear (see further information on studies)
Data from 1 RCT
Median change in total ulcer surface area mean 15 days
with air-fluidised support
with standard care
Absolute results not reported

P = 0.05
Effect size not calculated air-fluidised support

Systematic review
97 people being cared for at home
Data from 1 RCT
Median change in total ulcer surface area 36 weeks
with air-fluidised support
with standard care
Absolute results not reported

Reported as not significant
P value not reported
This RCT had a 13% withdrawal rate and did not perform an intention-to-treat analysis
Not significant

Systematic review
72 people, 65 people completed study, aged >18 years, acute care, grade I to IV ulcers Median change in wound surface area
–1.2 cm2 with air-fluidised mattress
+0.5 cm2 with alternating-pressure mattress covered in foam

95% CI for difference –9.2 cm2 to –0.6 cm2
P = 0.01
Effect size not calculated air-fluidised mattress