Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2011 Jun 25;357(2):283–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.06.025

Figure 3. The migration defect is specific to RP2 but not its sib.

Figure 3

Embryos are stained with anti-Eve, anterior end is up, midline is marked by vertical lines. Panel A: insc mutant with the duplication of RP2. Panel B: HemJ4-48; insc double mutant showing four RP2s on one hemisegment and none on the contralateral hemisegment. Panel C: numb mutant showing the duplication of sib. Panel D: HemJ4-48; numb double mutant showing the numb-phenotype without any sib migration across the midline.