Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 21;17(39):4408–4413. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i39.4408

Table 4.

Comparison of diagnostic performance of the three procedures for lesions < 10 mm and > 10 mm (%)

Conventional examination NBI Lugol’s solution
<10 mm >10 mm <10 mm >10 mm <10 mm >10 mm
Sensitivity (95% CI) 0 (0-0) 85.7 (59.8-100) 100 (100-100) 100 (100-100) 100 (100-100) 100 (100-100)
Specificity (95% CI) 100 (100-100) 100 (100-100) 90 (84.6-95.4) 96.7 (93.5-100) 75.8 (68.2-83.5) 96.7 (93.5-100)
PPV (95% CI) n/c 100 (100-100) 14.3 (4.0-32.6) 63.6 (35.2-92.1) 6.5 (2.2-15.1) 63.6 (35.2-92.1)
NPV (95% CI) 98.4 (96.1-100) 99.20 (97.6-100) 100 (100-100) 100 (100-100) 100 (100-100) 100 (100-100)
Accuracy (95% CI) 98.4 (96.1- 100) 99.2 (97.6-100) 90.2 (84.9-95.4) 96.9 (93.8-100) 76.2 (68.7-83.8) 96.9 (93.8-99.9)
PLR n/c n/c 10 30 4.1 30
NLR 1 0.1 0 0 0 0

n/c: Not calculable; NBI: Narrow-band imaging; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; PLR: Positive likelihood ratio; NLR: Negative likelihood ratio.