Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2011 Oct 25;82(6):1985–2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01667.x

Table 3.

Unstandardized and Standardized Estimates for Direct and Indirect Associations in the Path Analysis

Cognitive Development Positive Social Behavior Negative Social Behavior

B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β
Direct Effects on DVs
M Risk (T1) −1.59 0.36 −0.12 *** −0.06 0.06 −0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03
F Risk (T1) −0.23 0.33 −0.02 0.11 0.06 0.04 −0.02 0.03 −0.02
C Risk (T1) −0.04 0.09 −0.01 −0.01 0.02 −0.03 −0.01 0.01 −0.04
M-F Risk Interaction (T1) −0.94 0.65 −0.03 −0.07 0.12 −0.01 0.00 0.05 0.00
F Conflict (T2) 0.05 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02
M Conflict (T2) 0.10 0.15 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 −0.03 0.01 −0.07 *
F Cog. Stim. (T2) 0.70 0.11 0.14 *** 0.03 0.02 0.03 −0.01 0.01 −0.03
M Supportiveness (T2) 3.44 0.27 0.29 *** 1.62 0.05 0.66 *** −0.17 0.02 −0.20 ***
Spanking (T2) 0.02 0.20 0.00 −0.01 0.04 −0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
C Sex 3.36 0.39 0.16 *** 0.39 0.07 0.09 *** −0.09 0.03 −0.06 **
C Age (T2) 2.04 0.21 0.19 *** 0.12 0.04 0.05 *** 0.02 0.02 0.03
M NCATS (T1) 0.14 0.05 0.06 ** 0.00 0.01 0.00 −0.01 0.00 −0.03
F Cog. Stim. (T1) −0.13 0.10 −0.03 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
Direct Effects on Endogenous Variables
M risk (T1) → F cog. stim. (T2) −0.15 0.06 −0.06 * −0.15 0.06 −0.06 * −0.15 0.06 −0.06 *
F risk (T1) → F cog. stim. (T2) −0.03 0.07 −0.01 −0.03 0.07 −0.01 −0.03 0.07 −0.01
M-F risk (T1) → F cog. stim. (T2) −0.02 0.02 −0.04 −0.02 0.02 −0.04 −0.02 0.02 −0.04
C risk (T1) → F cog. stim. (T2) −0.35 0.12 −0.05 ** −0.35 0.12 −0.05 ** −0.35 0.12 −0.05 **
F conflict → F cog. stim. (T2) −0.07 0.03 −0.05 * −0.07 0.03 −0.05 * −0.07 0.03 −0.05 *
M conflict → F cog. stim. (T2) −0.04 0.03 −0.03 −0.04 0.03 −0.03 −0.04 0.03 −0.03
C sex → F cog. stim. (T2) 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02
C age (T2) → F cog. stim. (T2) 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.02
M NCATS (T1) → F cog. stim. (T2) 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.03
F cog. stim. (T1) → F cog. stim. (T2) 0.45 0.02 0.47 *** 0.45 0.02 0.47 *** 0.45 0.02 0.47 ***
M risk (T1) → M supportiveness (T2) −0.17 0.03 −0.15 *** −0.17 0.03 −0.15 *** −0.17 0.03 −0.15 ***
F risk (T1) → M supportiveness (T2) −0.13 0.03 −0.12 *** −0.13 0.03 −0.12 *** −0.13 0.03 −0.12 ***
M-F risk (T1) → M supportiveness (T2) −0.02 0.01 −0.06 −0.02 0.01 −0.06 −0.02 0.01 −0.06
C risk (T1) → M supportiveness (T2) −0.04 0.06 −0.01 −0.04 0.06 −0.01 −0.04 0.06 −0.01
F conflict (T2) → M supportiveness (T2) 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.05
M conflict (T2) → M supportiveness (T2) 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02
C sex → M supportiveness (T2) 0.08 0.04 0.05 * 0.08 0.04 0.05 * 0.08 0.04 0.05 *
C age (T2) → M supportiveness (T2) 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01
M NCATS (T1) → M supportiveness (T2) 0.04 0.01 0.19 *** 0.04 0.01 0.19 *** 0.04 0.01 0.19 ***
F cog. stim. (T1) → M supportiveness (T2) 0.02 0.01 0.06 * 0.02 0.01 0.06 * 0.02 0.01 0.06 *
M risk (T1) → Spanking (T2) −0.04 0.05 −0.03 −0.04 0.05 −0.03 −0.04 0.05 −0.03
F risk (T1) → Spanking (T2) −0.01 0.05 −0.01 −0.01 0.05 −0.01 −0.01 0.05 −0.01
M-F risk (T1) → Spanking (T2) 0.00 0.01 −0.01 0.00 0.01 −0.01 0.00 0.01 −0.01
C risk (T1) → Spanking (T2) 0.35 0.09 0.10 *** 0.35 0.09 0.10 *** 0.35 0.09 0.10 ***
F conflict (T2) → Spanking (T2) 0.06 0.02 0.08 ** 0.06 0.02 0.08 ** 0.06 0.02 0.08 **
M conflict (T2) → Spanking (T2) 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03
C sex → Spanking (T2) −0.14 0.05 −0.06 ** −0.14 0.05 −0.06 ** −0.14 0.05 −0.06 **
C age (T2) → Spanking (T2) −0.01 0.03 −0.01 −0.01 0.03 −0.01 −0.01 0.03 −0.01
M NCATS (T1) → Spanking (T2) −0.02 0.01 −0.06 * −0.02 0.01 −0.06 * −0.02 0.01 −0.06 *
F cog. stim. (T1) → Spanking (T2) −0.05 0.01 −0.11 *** −0.05 0.01 −0.11 *** −0.05 0.01 −0.11 ***
M risk (T1) → F conflict (T2) −0.10 0.06 −0.05 −0.10 0.06 −0.05 −0.10 0.06 −0.05
F risk (T1) → F conflict (T2) 0.17 0.06 0.09 ** 0.17 0.06 0.09 ** 0.17 0.06 0.09 **
M/F risk (T1) → F conflict (T2) −0.05 0.02 −0.13 ** −0.05 0.02 −0.13 ** −0.05 0.02 −0.13 **
C risk (T1) → F conflict (T2) 0.08 0.13 0.02 0.08 0.13 0.02 0.08 0.13 0.02
M NCATS (T1) → F conflict (T2) 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02
F cog. stim. (T1) → F conflict (T2) −0.04 0.02 −0.05 * −0.04 0.02 −0.05 * −0.04 0.02 −0.05 *
M risk (T1) → M conflict (T2) −0.07 0.06 −0.04 −0.07 0.06 −0.04 −0.07 0.06 −0.04
F risk (T1) → M conflict (T2) 0.19 0.06 0.10 ** 0.19 0.06 0.10 ** 0.19 0.06 0.10 **
M/F risk (T1) → M conflict (T2) −0.04 0.02 −0.11 ** −0.04 0.02 −0.11 ** −0.04 0.02 −0.11 **
C risk (T1) → M conflict (T2) 0.53 0.11 0.11 *** 0.53 0.11 0.11 *** 0.53 0.11 0.11 ***
M NCATS (T1) → M conflict (T2) 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.05
F cog. stim. (T1) → M conflict (T2) −0.03 0.02 −0.04 −0.03 0.02 −0.04 −0.03 0.02 −0.04
Total Indirect Effects on DVs
M risk (T1) −0.70 0.13 −0.05 *** −0.28 0.05 −0.02 *** 0.03 0.01 0.03 ***
F risk (T1) −0.43 0.13 −0.03 ** −0.20 0.05 −0.07 *** 0.02 0.01 0.02 *
M-F risk (T1) −0.08 0.03 −0.03 −0.03 0.01 −0.01 0.00 0.00 0.02
C risk (T1) −0.31 0.23 −0.01 −0.07 0.09 −0.05 0.00 0.01 0.00
M conflict (T2) 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
F conflict (T2) 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 −0.01
M NCATS (T1) 0.14 0.02 0.06 *** 0.06 0.01 0.13 *** −0.01 0.00 −0.04 ***
F Cog. Stim (T1) 0.38 0.06 0.08 *** 0.05 0.02 0.05 ** −0.01 0.01 −0.03
*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

Note. Standardized values less than .10 are considered small effects, values around .30 are medium effects, and values greater than .50 are large effects. Results are based on weighted analyses.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure