Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Rev. 2011 Sep 1;35(4):428–451. doi: 10.1177/0193841X11419314

Table 3. Sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported HIV status among PartyIntents respondents, by mode of follow-up assessment.

In-Person Web-Based
N (%) N (%)
Total 147 (100.0) 85 (100.0)
Age
 21-30 41 (31.1) 23 (30.3)
 31-40 39 (29.5) 25 (32.9)
 >=41 52 (39.4) 28 (36.8)
Race
 White, Non-Hispanic 112 (76.2) 66 (77.6)
 Black, Non-Hispanic 6 (4.1) 1 (1.2)
 Asian, Non-Hispanic 3 (2.0) 6 (7.1)
 Other, Non-Hispanic 5 (3.4) 2 (2.4)
 Hispanic 21 (14.3) 10 (11.8)
Relationship Status
 Married 9 (6.1) 2 (2.4)
 Live-in Male Partner 40 (27.2) 33 (38.8)
 Steady Boyfriend 20 (13.6) 13 (15.3)
 Single 78 (53.1) 37 (43.5)
Educational Attainment
 Less than college 24 (16.3) 11 (12.9)
 Bachelor's 61 (41.5) 41 (48.2)
 Post-graduate studies 62 (42.2) 33 (38.8)
Employment Status
 Full-Time 119 (81.0) 78 (91.8)
 Part-time/Student 10 (6.8) 2 (2.4)
 Other 18 (12.2) 5 (5.9)
Residential Status
 Within Metro Area 62 (42.2) 38 (44.7)
 Outside Metro Area, within U.S.A. 67 (45.6) 40 (47.1)
 Outside U.S.A. 18 (12.2) 7 (8.2)
Tested Positive for HIV 21 (14.4) 18 (21.2)

Metro area was defined as the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) in which the party was located for the Southeast site, and as the closest city with over 100,000 persons to the Northeast site.

There were no significant differences between those who completed the follow-up in-person versus online across these characteristics.