Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr 26;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-2-1

Table 1.

Methods of clinical ethics research

Theoretical
 → Philosophy (e.g., How should decisions on setting priorities be made legitimate
and fair?)
 → Theology (e.g., What Catholic values should guide decisions on setting priorities
in Catholic hospitals?)
 → Law (e.g., What practices in setting priorities in a regional health authority might
constitute discrimination?)
 → Policy (e.g., What policy should governments follow in funding new technologies
in medicine?)
Empirical
 → Social sciences (e.g., How do regional health authorities in developing countries
make decisions on setting priorities?)
 → Decision analysis (e.g., How do you trade-off considerations of equity and
efficiency in decisions on setting priorities?)
 → Clinical epidemiology (e.g., What are the criteria used to allocate liver
transplants?)
 → Health services research (e.g., How does the delivery of cardiac surgery vary by
patient gender or ethnicity?)